CONTACT INFORMATION REVIEWS & MORE DATA

SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM Ratings and Reviews

  • Date Updated:  July 31, 2024
  • Address:  740 EAST STATE STREET, SHARON, PA 16146
  • Phone:  (724) 983-3911
  • Type:  Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership:  Proprietary
  • Overall Rating:  
  • Perc. Patients Recommending:   46%

  About SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM

SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in SHARON, PA. Its type of ownership is Proprietary. The facility's Medicare ID is 390211. It does provide emergency services. There are 176 medical professionals and 82 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM, emergency patients were charged $22,307. This is lower than the state average of $25,156. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 70 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 22 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 77 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 17 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 67 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 10 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 23 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 66 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 9 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 25 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 73 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 20 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 80 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 15 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 72 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 65 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 25 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 51 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 18 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 31 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 51 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 21 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 28 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 52 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 33 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 48 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 30 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 22 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 62 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 15 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 23 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 34 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 45 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 21 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 83 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 19 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 81 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 85 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 50 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 9 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 41 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 54 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 36 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 53 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 39 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 44 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 9 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 47 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 60 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 15 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 25 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 44 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 19 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 37 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 21 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 27 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 52 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 16 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 46 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 38 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $12
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $7
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $50
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $6
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $8
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $618
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $10,914
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $30
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $1,299
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $812
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $98
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $3,811
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $670
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,768
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $89
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,116
Total (Complete Episode) $22,307

Infection Rates at SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM

These measures show how often patients at SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.12 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 2.33 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 3,053.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 2.84 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 2.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.71 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 1.18 / Worse
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 3.72 / Worse
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 5,415.00 / Worse
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 5.49 / Worse
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 12.00 / Worse
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 2.19 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 32.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 0.27 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.24 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 4.80 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 23,243.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 1.38 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 2.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia 1.45 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.06 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.64 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 23,243.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 12.76 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 3.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.24 / Better

How SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in SHARON, PA

Worst Hospitals in SHARON, PA

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 4% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients 13.1% SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients 11.4% SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients 10.1% SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients 17.1% SAME
Death rate for stroke patients 15.1% SAME
Pressure ulcer rate 0.28% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications NA Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.22% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.09% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.25% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.5% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 10.11% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.69% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 6.41% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 1.93% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 0.98% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.98% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
St Mary's Alzheimer's Center 5:
Masternick Memorial Health Care Center 5:
Caprice Health Care Center 5:
Center For Rehabilitation at Hampton Woods The 5:
Shepherd of The Valley Poland 5:
Haven Convalescent Home, Inc 5:
Briarfield Place 5:
Shepherd of The Valley-Boardman 5:
Jameson Nursing and Rehab Center 5:
Maplecrest Nursing and Hta 5:
Austinwoods Rehab Health Care 5:
Austintown Healthcare Center 5:
Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare 5:
Heritage Manor Jewish Hm For 5:
Orchard Manor 5:
Quality Life Services - Grove City 5:
Saint John Xxiii Home 5:
Avalon Springs Place 5:
Meadowbrook Manor 5:
Ohio Living Lake Vista 5:
Cortland Center 5:
Saint Paul Homes 5:
Auburn Skilled Nursing and Rehab 4:
Salem North Healthcare Center 4:
Quality Life Services - New Castle 4:
The Grove at New Castle 4:
Briarfield at Ashley Circle 4:
Autumn Hills Care Center 4:
Addison Healthcare Center 4:
Quality Life Services - Mercer 4:
Gillette Nursing Home 4:
Shepherd of The Valley Howland 4:
The Grove at Greenville 4:
Avalon Care Center 3:
Canfield Acres LLC Dba Windsor House at Canfield 3:
The Grove at New Wilmington 3:
Windsor Health Care Center 3:
Liberty Health Care Center Inc 3:
Grove Manor 3:
Laurie Ann Nursing Home 3:
Shepherd of The Valley Liberty 3:
Warren Nursing and Rehab 3:
Windsor House at Champion 3:
Blossom Nursing and Rehab Center 2:
Parkside Health Care Center 2:
Circle of Care 2:
Salem West Healthcare Center 2:
Aventura at Assumption Village 2:
Willow Woods Rehabilitation and Nursing 2:
Edison Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Danridges Burgundi Manor 2:
Omni Manor Nursing Home 2:
Aventura at Humility House 2:
Vista Center at The Ridge 2:
White Oak Manor 2:
Washington Square Healthcare Center 2:
Concord Care Center of Cortland 2:
Eagle Pointe Skilled Nursing and Rehab 2:
Hampton Woods Nursing Center, Inc 1:
Greenbriar Center 1:
Vista Center of Boardman 1:
Beeghly Oaks Center For Rehabilitation and Healing 1:
Park Center Healthcare and Rehabilitation 1:
Oasis Center For Rehabilitation and Healing 1:
Canfield Healthcare Center 1:
Briarfield Manor 1:
Park Vista Nursing and Rehab By Mcare Health 1:
O'brien Memorial Health Care C 1:
Clepper Manor 1:
Hermitage Nursing and Rehabilitation 1:
Community Skilled Health Care 1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM

There are 176 doctors and 82 medical groups that are affiliated with SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM.

Affiliated Doctor Groups


The list of medical professionals associated with SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM.

Healthcare Search Options

Make informed decisions about your healthcare options

Our site is designed to help you find the information you need quickly and easily, no matter what type of healthcare provider you're looking for. We provide a wealth of statistics and data that can help you make informed decisions about your healthcare options.

SEARCH OUR HEALTHCARE DATABASES

Home Healthcare

Nursing Homes

Owners & Operators

Dialysis

Hospitals

Doctor Groups

Doctors

Hospice

Purchase a Marketing or Other Report from our Database

We can provide custom data reports based on our database of skilled nursing facilities. Anything from emails to spreadsheets to an API. Bring the data directly into Salesforce or any other CRM.

  • Facility Name
  • Owner Name
  • Mailing Address
  • Contact Information
  • Phone Numbers
  • Website Addresses
  • File Formats: .xls, .csv, .txt
  • APIs

Reports updated monthly.

Request Report Pricing