INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL

INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in LEESBURG, VA. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 490043. It does provide emergency services. There are 739 medical professionals and 139 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $22,898. This is lower than the state average of $24,851. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	79 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	17 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	87 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	10 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	77 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	74 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	74 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	69 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	25 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	65 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	27 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	29 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	67 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	25 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	58 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	22 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	20 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	73 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	10 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	43 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	34 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	23 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	88 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	13 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	87 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	88 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	40 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	54 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	46 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	52 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	32 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	62 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	77 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	7 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	16 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	66 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	6 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	28 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	4 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	16 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	80 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	81 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	16 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$16
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$13
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$46
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$6
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$7
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$820
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$10,016
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$21
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,429
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$781
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$241
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,574
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$642
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,630
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$118
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,536
Total (Complete Episode)	$22,898

Infection Rates at INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.29 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	3.15 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	3,690.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	2.59 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	3.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	1.16 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.10 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.87 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	4,697.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	3.53 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.57 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.19 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	2.05 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	147.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	3.98 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	3.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.75 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	86.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.71 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.37 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	59,456.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	2.19 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.06 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.34 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	51,697.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	32.96 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	5.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.15 / Better

How INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in LEESBURG, VA

Worst Hospitals in LEESBURG, VA

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	10.5%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	7.4%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	8.4%	Better
Death rate for pneumonia patients	15.1%	Better
Death rate for stroke patients	11.5%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.3%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	120.84%	Better
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.28%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	1.9%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.39%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	8.88%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.66%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.79%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.26%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.86%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Greenspring Village	5:
Woodbine Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	5:
Goodwin House Alexandria	5:
Goodwin House Bailey's Crossroads	5:
Arleigh Burke Pavilion	5:
Sibley Mem Hosp Renaissance	5:
Forest Hills of Dc	5:
Lisner Louise Dickson Hurthome	5:
Maplewood Park Place	5:
Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	5:
Montcare at Potomac	5:
Johnson Cntr/falcons Landing	5:
Hebrew Home of Greater Washington	5:
Sterling Care Rockville Nursing	5:
Bedford Court Healthcare Cent.	5:
Ingleside at King Farm	5:
Friends Nursing Home	5:
Wilson Health Care Center	5:
Montgomery Village Care Center	5:
Buckingham's Choice	5:
Birmingham Green	4:
Manassas Health and Rehab Center	4:
Lake Manassas Health and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Burke Health and Rehabilitation Center	4:
The Jefferson	4:
August Healthcare at Iliff	4:
Dulles Health and Rehab Center	4:
Knollwood Hsc	4:
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Chevy Chase	4:
Carriage Hill Bethesda	4:
Montcare at Bethesda	4:
Ashby Ponds Inc	4:
Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare	4:
Heritage Hall-Leesburg	4:
Brooke Grove Rehab. and Nsg Ctr	4:
Alexandria Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	3:
Annandale Healthcare Center	3:
The Virginian	3:
Unique Rehabilitation and Health Center LLC	3:
Inspire Rehabilitation and Health Center LLC	3:
Stoddard Baptist Nursing Home	3:
Ingleside at Rock Creek	3:
Regency Care of Silver Spring, LLC	3:
Sterling Care Bethesda	3:
Complete Care at Wheaton	3:
The Village at Rockville	3:
Bel Pre Healthcare Center	3:
Willow Tree Healthcare Center	3:
Lorien Health Systems Mt Airy	3:
Care Haven Center	3:
Fauquier Health Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	2:
George Washington Health and Rehabilitation	2:
Gainesville Health and Rehab Center	2:
August Healthcare at Leewood	2:
Fairfax Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	2:
Regency Care of Arlington, LLC	2:
Fair Oaks Health and Rehabilitation	2:
Cherrydale Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oakview	2:
Potomac Falls Health and Rehab Center	2:
Kensington Healthcare Center	2:
Montcare at Wheaton	2:
Collingswood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	2:
Layhill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Shady Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Frederick Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Ballenger Creek	2:
Northampton Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente	2:
Citizens Care and Rehabilitation Center of Frederi	2:
Canterbury Center	2:
Brookside Rehab and Nursing Center	1:
Mount Vernon Healthcare Center	1:
Bridgepoint Sub-Acute and Rehab National Harborside	1:
Carlin Springs Health and Rehabilitation	1:
Fox Chase Healthcare	1:
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arcola	1:
Loudoun Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	1:
Shenandoah Center	1:
Pleasant View Healthcare Center	1:
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Braddock Heights	1:
Vierra Falls Church	No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL

There are 739 doctors and 139 medical groups that are affiliated with INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with INOVA LOUDOUN HOSPITAL.