UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER Ratings and Reviews

About UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA. Its type of ownership is Government - State. The facility's Medicare ID is 490009. It does provide emergency services. There are 1,504 medical professionals and 119 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER, emergency patients were charged $30,770. This is higher than the state average of $24,851. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	80 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	17 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	88 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	10 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	81 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	15 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	88 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	9 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	80 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	16 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	75 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	20 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	58 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	11 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	31 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	58 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	33 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	57 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	12 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	31 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	59 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	19 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	22 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	74 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	9 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	44 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	30 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	26 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	89 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	89 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	88 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	38 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	58 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	40 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	55 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	39 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	57 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	32 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	64 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	67 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	11 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	22 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	44 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	17 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	39 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	7 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	19 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	74 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	81 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	16 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$13
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$1
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$36
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$258
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$6
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$7
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$642
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$16,760
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$25
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$2,072
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$856
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$129
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,416
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,466
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$2,770
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$123
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,191
Total (Complete Episode)	$30,770

Infection Rates at UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER

These measures show how often patients at UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.76 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.43 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	32,966.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	37.01 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	39.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	1.05 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.39 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	0.99 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	17,990.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	28.31 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	18.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.64 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.54 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.56 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	547.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	14.67 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	14.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.96 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	0.18 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	1.97 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	538.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	4.15 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	3.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	0.72 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.36 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.14 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	203,169.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	17.90 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	12.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.67 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.21 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.44 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	183,486.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	90.20 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	28.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.31 / Better

How UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

Worst Hospitals in CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.2%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	11.8%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	2.7%	SAME
Death rate for COPD patients	9.6%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	10.3%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	17.1%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	12.2%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.99%	Worse
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	180.07%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.16%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	1.92%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.88%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	6.72%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.23%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	5.79%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	2.12%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.45%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.05%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Westminster Canterbury Blue Ri	5:
Colonnades Health Care Center	5:
Summit Square	5:
Dogwood Village of Orange County Health and Rehab	5:
Mountain View Nursing Home	5:
Charlottesville Health and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Monroe Health and Rehab Center	3:
The Laurels of Charlottesville	3:
Our Lady of Peace Inc	3:
Greene Acres Rehabilitation and Nursing	3:
Cedars Healthcare Center	2:
River Edge Rehabilitation and Nursing	2:
Autumn Care of Madison	2:
Oakhurst Health and Rehabilitation	1:
Albemarle Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER

There are 1,504 doctors and 119 medical groups that are affiliated with UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER.