FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD Ratings and Reviews

About FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD

FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in TAMPA, FL. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Church. The facility's Medicare ID is 100069. It does provide emergency services. There are 245 medical professionals and 78 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD, emergency patients were charged $27,007. This is higher than the state average of $25,576. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	15 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	11 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	18 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	74 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	17 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	73 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	70 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	22 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	62 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	13 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	25 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	12 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	25 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	62 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	24 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	58 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	24 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	18 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	72 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	13 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	15 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	44 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	35 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	21 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	85 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	83 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	88 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	39 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	53 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	11 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	46 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	42 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	51 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	33 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	60 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	68 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	13 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	19 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	68 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	8 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	24 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	13 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	21 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	66 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	10 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	67 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	23 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$22
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$78
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$30
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$5
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$6
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$813
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$13,146
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$30
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$2,051
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,095
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$235
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,180
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$490
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,056
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$159
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,611
Total (Complete Episode)	$27,007

Infection Rates at FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD

These measures show how often patients at FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.33 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	3,321.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	2.26 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.74 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	2,465.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.73 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.02 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.47 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	119.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	3.36 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.30 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	6.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.04 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.71 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	31,782.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	1.76 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.09 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.65 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	31,782.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	14.87 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	4.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.27 / Better

How FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in TAMPA, FL

Worst Hospitals in TAMPA, FL

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.7%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	12.1%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	10.1%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	12.8%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	15.2%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate	0.28%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	161.54%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.27%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.44%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.98%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	14.05%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.7%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	5.29%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.92%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.97%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.09%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Kr at College Harbor	5:
Baldomero Lopez Memorial Veterans Nursing Home	5:
The Cedar at Mease Life	5:
Sun Terrace Health Care Center	5:
Belleair Health Care Center	5:
Palm Garden of Sun City	5:
Solaris Healthcare Lake Zephyr	5:
North Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	5:
Canterbury Towers Inc	5:
St Mark Village	5:
Plaza West	5:
Westminster Suncoast	5:
Trinity Regional Rehab Center	4:
Solaris Healthcare Plant City	4:
Aspire at Ridge Haven	4:
Fairway Oaks Center	4:
Oak Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Concordia Manor	4:
Westchester Gardens Health and Rehabilitation	4:
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Bayonet Point	4:
Morton Plant Rehabilitation Center	4:
Palm Garden of Clearwater	4:
Adventhealth Dade City	4:
Wrights Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Oakpark Health and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Springs at Boca Ciega Bay	4:
Ybor City Center For Rehabilitation and Healing	4:
Solaris Healthcare Zephyrhills	4:
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of New Port Richey	4:
Bay Pointe Nursing Pavilion	4:
Windsor Woods Rehab and Healthcare Center	3:
Northdale Rehabilitation Center	3:
Aspire at The Harbor	3:
Woodbridge Care Center and Rehab	3:
South Heritage Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Community Convalescent Center	3:
Golfview Nursing Center	3:
Alpine Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Aspire at Lakeside Oaks	3:
Aspire at Countryside	3:
Excel Care Center	3:
Palm Garden of Tampa	3:
Royal Oak Nursing Center	3:
Tampa Lakes Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
St. Andrew Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center	3:
East Bay Rehabilitation Center	3:
The Luxe at Lutz Rehabilitation Center	3:
Blue Heron Health and Rehabilitation	3:
Shore Acres Care Center and Rehab	3:
Life Care Center of New Port Richey	3:
Lexington Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Madison Pointe Care Center	3:
Laurellwood Post- Acute and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Harbourwood Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Southern Pines Nursing Center	3:
Advanced Care Center	3:
Freedom Square Health Care Center	3:
Gulf Shore Care Center	3:
Marion and Bernard L Samson Nursing Center	3:
Gateway Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Bayside Care Center	2:
Regency Oaks Health Center	2:
Apollo Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Carrington Place of St Pete	2:
Meadowpark Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Palm Garden of Largo	2:
Dunedin Care Center	2:
Bayshore Pointe Nursing and Rehab Center	2:
Tierra Pines Center	2:
Concordia Village of Tampa	2:
Gandy Fl Opco, LLC	2:
Alhambra Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Solaris Healthcare Bayonet Point	2:
Heather Hill Healthcare Center	2:
Hillside Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Boca Ciega Center	2:
Highland Pines Rehabilitation Center	2:
Gulfside Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Aspire at Seminole	2:
The Oaks of Clearwater	2:
The Home Association	2:
Kensington Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center	2:
Whispering Oaks	2:
Aspire at The Bay	1:
Aspire at Sand Key	1:
Pinellas Park Fl Opco, LLC	1:
Aventura at The Bay	1:
Aspire at Bryan Dairy	1:
Pinellas Point Nursing and Rehab Center	1:
Eagle Lake Nursing and Rehab Care Center	1:
Aspire at Oldsmar	1:
Aspire at Fletcher	1:
The Bristol Care Center	1:
Aspire at The Sea - Pasadena	1:
Carrollwood Care Center	1:
Sabal Palms Health and Rehabilitation	1:
Palm Garden of Pinellas	1:
Aspire at The Palms	1:
Balanced Healthcare	1:
Tarpon Bayou Center	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD

There are 245 doctors and 78 medical groups that are affiliated with FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with FLORIDA HOSPITAL CARROLLWOOD.