CONTACT INFORMATION REVIEWS & MORE DATA

LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

  • Date Updated:  July 31, 2024
  • Address:  305 LANGDON STREET, SOMERSET, KY 42503
  • Phone:  (606) 679-7441
  • Type:  Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership:  Proprietary
  • Overall Rating:  
  • Perc. Patients Recommending:   48%

  About LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL

LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in SOMERSET, KY. Its type of ownership is Proprietary. The facility's Medicare ID is 180132. It does provide emergency services. There are 245 medical professionals and 76 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $24,615. This is lower than the state average of $25,650. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 19 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 83 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 14 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 21 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 70 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 9 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 17 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 72 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 22 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 59 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 26 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 59 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 27 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 59 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 25 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 55 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 27 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 18 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 69 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 15 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 16 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 41 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 40 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 19 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 83 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 20 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 80 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 86 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 51 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 42 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 55 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 37 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 54 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 40 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 50 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 50 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 26 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 24 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 53 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 13 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 34 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 18 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 29 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 53 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 13 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 48 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 39 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $13
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $11
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $210
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $6
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $22
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $768
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $10,409
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $37
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $1,321
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $800
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $107
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $4,392
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $932
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $4,243
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $181
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,162
Total (Complete Episode) $24,615

Infection Rates at LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.08 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.55 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 3,813.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 4.26 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 2.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.47 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.12 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 0.88 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 6,336.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 10.91 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 4.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.37 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit 0.76 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit 5.80 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 59.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 1.66 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 4.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery 2.40 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit 0.17 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit 3.43 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 212.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 1.93 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 2.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy 1.04 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 1.42 / Worse
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 5.33 / Worse
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 37,473.00 / Worse
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 3.10 / Worse
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 9.00 / Worse
MRSA Bacteremia 2.90 / Worse
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.34 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.94 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 35,323.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 25.63 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 15.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.59 / Better

How LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in SOMERSET, KY

Worst Hospitals in SOMERSET, KY

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients 13.2% SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients 11.7% SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients 14.1% SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients 21.5% SAME
Death rate for stroke patients 13.5% SAME
Pressure ulcer rate 1.05% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications 149.04% SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.27% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.1% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.64% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.38% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 11.65% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 2.82% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 3.95% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 1.84% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 0.92% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 1.1% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
Williamsburg Health and Rehabilitation Center 5:
Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital Scu 5:
Rockcastle Regional Hospital and Respiratory Care 5:
Mountain Ridge Health and Rehabilitation 2:
Fair Oaks Health and Rehabilitation 2:
Somerwoods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Cumberland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Rockcastle Health and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Somerset Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility 1:
Liberty Care and Rehabilitation Center 1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL

There are 245 doctors and 76 medical groups that are affiliated with LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups


The list of medical professionals associated with LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL.

Healthcare Search Options

Make informed decisions about your healthcare options

Our site is designed to help you find the information you need quickly and easily, no matter what type of healthcare provider you're looking for. We provide a wealth of statistics and data that can help you make informed decisions about your healthcare options.

SEARCH OUR HEALTHCARE DATABASES

Home Healthcare

Nursing Homes

Owners & Operators

Dialysis

Hospitals

Doctor Groups

Doctors

Hospice

Purchase a Marketing or Other Report from our Database

We can provide custom data reports based on our database of skilled nursing facilities. Anything from emails to spreadsheets to an API. Bring the data directly into Salesforce or any other CRM.

  • Facility Name
  • Owner Name
  • Mailing Address
  • Contact Information
  • Phone Numbers
  • Website Addresses
  • File Formats: .xls, .csv, .txt
  • APIs

Reports updated monthly.

Request Report Pricing