CONTACT INFORMATION REVIEWS & MORE DATA

MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S Ratings and Reviews

  • Date Updated:  July 31, 2024
  • Address:  500 SOUTH CLEVELAND AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43213
  • Phone:  (614) 546-4784
  • Type:  Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership:  Voluntary non-profit - Private
  • Overall Rating:  
  • Perc. Patients Recommending:   71%

  About MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S

MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in COLUMBUS, OH. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 360012. It does provide emergency services. There are 568 medical professionals and 88 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S, emergency patients were charged $25,864. This is higher than the state average of $25,795. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 18 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 21 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 77 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 19 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 71 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 24 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 61 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 30 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 29 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 60 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 10 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 30 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 57 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 22 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 21 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 74 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 8 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 18 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 40 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 36 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 24 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 85 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 84 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 86 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 52 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 49 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 45 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 52 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 60 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 64 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 12 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 24 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 48 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 14 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 38 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 8 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 19 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 73 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 5 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 71 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 24 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $13
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $29
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $160
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $23
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $15
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $878
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $11,815
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $23
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $1,545
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $737
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $199
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $3,967
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $776
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $4,108
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $121
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,454
Total (Complete Episode) $25,864

Infection Rates at MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S

These measures show how often patients at MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.15 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.58 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 5,433.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 5.16 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 3.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.58 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.29 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.74 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 6,254.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 6.38 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 5.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.78 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit 0.22 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit 2.36 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 134.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 3.46 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 3.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery 0.87 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 78.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 0.76 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.25 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 2.70 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 60,893.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 3.02 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 3.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia 0.99 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.05 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.41 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 54,945.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 23.52 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 4.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.17 / Better

How MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in COLUMBUS, OH

Worst Hospitals in COLUMBUS, OH

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 2.9% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients 13.1% SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients 3.6% SAME
Death rate for COPD patients 9.2% SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients 13.3% SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients 20.7% SAME
Death rate for stroke patients 13.3% SAME
Pressure ulcer rate 0.4% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications 181.28% SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.3% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.09% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 3.37% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.26% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 9.11% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 4.12% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 5.72% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 2.27% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.29% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 1.01% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
Meadow Grove Transitional Care 5:
Ohio Living Westminster-Thurber 5:
Mohun Health Care Center 5:
Otterbein at Granville 5:
Wesley Woods at New Albany 5:
Westerwood Rehabilitation 5:
Highbanks Care Center 5:
Willow Brook Christian Home 5:
Johnstown Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 5:
Capri Gardens 5:
Country View of Sunbury 5:
Ohio Living Sarah Moore 5:
Violet Springs Health Campus 4:
London Health and Rehab Center 4:
Robert A Barnes Center 4:
Scioto Pointe 4:
Mill Run Care Center 4:
Riverview 4:
New Albany Care Center 4:
Wesley Glen Health Services Corp 4:
Smiths Mill Health Campus 4:
Friendship Village of Dublin 4:
The Laurels of Worthington 4:
Worthington Christian Village 4:
Cherith Care Center at Willow Brook 4:
Centerburg Respiratory and Specialty Rehab Ctr 4:
Circleville Post-Acute 3:
Buckeye Care and Rehabilitation 3:
Lanfair Center For Rehab and Nsg Care Inc 3:
Altercare of Canal Winchester Post-Acute Rc 3:
The Laurels of West Columbus 3:
Arbors West 3:
Wexner Heritage House 3:
Mcnaughten Pointe Nursing and Rehab 3:
Tuscany Gardens 3:
Norwich Springs Health Campus 3:
Trueman Pointe Care Center 3:
Darby Glenn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3:
Columbus Alzheimer's Care Ctr 3:
Crown Pointe Care Center 3:
The Laurels of Walden Park 3:
Memorial Gables 3:
Country Club Center V, Inc 3:
Centerburg Pointe 3:
Main Street Terrace Care Center 2:
Arbors at Carroll 2:
Canal Winchester Care Center 2:
Pickerington Care and Rehabilitation 2:
Scioto Rehabilitation and Care Center 2:
Monterey Care Center 2:
West Park Care Center LLC 2:
Eastland Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 2:
Columbus Healthcare Center 2:
Mother Angeline Mccrory Manor 2:
First Community Village Healthcare Ctr 2:
Pataskala Oaks Care Center 2:
Taylor Springs Health Campus 2:
Continuing Healthcare of Gahanna 2:
Arlington Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Forest Hills Center 2:
Convalarium at Indian Run 2:
Buckeye Terrace Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 2:
Prestige Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 2:
Delaware Court Health Care Center 2:
Arbors at Delaware 2:
Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center 1:
Embassy of Winchester 1:
Embassy of Woodview 1:
Majestic Care of Whitehall 1:
Bella Terrace Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 1:
Capital City Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce 1:
The Laurels of Gahanna 1:
Otterbein Gahanna 1:
Mayfair Village Nursing Care C 1:
The Sanctuary at Tuttle Crossing 1:
Otterbein New Albany 1:
Columbus Colony Elderly Care 1:
Legacy Dublin 1:
Grand The 1:
Legacy Westerville 1:
Laurels of Norworth The 1:
Milcrest Nursing Center 1:
Majestic Care of Columbus LLC No Data
Allbridge Rehabilitation and Nursing Center No Data
Landings of Westerville Health and Rehab The No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S

There are 568 doctors and 88 medical groups that are affiliated with MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S.

Affiliated Doctor Groups


The list of medical professionals associated with MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with MOUNT CARMEL ST ANN'S.

Healthcare Search Options

Make informed decisions about your healthcare options

Our site is designed to help you find the information you need quickly and easily, no matter what type of healthcare provider you're looking for. We provide a wealth of statistics and data that can help you make informed decisions about your healthcare options.

SEARCH OUR HEALTHCARE DATABASES

Home Healthcare

Nursing Homes

Owners & Operators

Dialysis

Hospitals

Doctor Groups

Doctors

Hospice

Purchase a Marketing or Other Report from our Database

We can provide custom data reports based on our database of skilled nursing facilities. Anything from emails to spreadsheets to an API. Bring the data directly into Salesforce or any other CRM.

  • Facility Name
  • Owner Name
  • Mailing Address
  • Contact Information
  • Phone Numbers
  • Website Addresses
  • File Formats: .xls, .csv, .txt
  • APIs

Reports updated monthly.

Request Report Pricing