88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB) Ratings and Reviews

  About 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB)

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB) to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	89 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	10 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	95 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	87 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	88 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	88 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	1 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	11 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	93 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	1 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	12 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	85 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	1 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	87 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	1 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	12 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	89 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	1 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	10 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	83 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	1 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	16 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	81 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	7 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	12 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	89 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	3 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	8 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	72 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	11 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	17 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	8 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	92 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	9 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	91 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	7 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	93 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	29 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	67 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	61 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	30 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	66 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	21 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	75 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	78 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	7 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	15 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	76 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	2 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	22 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	2 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	11 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	87 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	2 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	88 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	10 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB), Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB) provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB): Not Available

We do not have detailed cost analysis for 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB).

Infection Rates at 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB)

These measures show how often patients at 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB) contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	192.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	0.16 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	311.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	0.18 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	2,849.00 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	0.97 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	Not Available / Not Available

How 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB) Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB) compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

Worst Hospitals in Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB)

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for pneumonia patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for stroke patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	NA	Not Enough Data
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative sepsis rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	NA	Not Enough Data
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	NA	Not Enough Data

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB)

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB) ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Ohio Living Cape May	5:
Otterbein Middletown	5:
Hillspring Health Care and Rehab	5:
Astoria Health and Rehab Center	5:
Sycamorespring of Miamisburg	5:
Bethany Village	5:
Oak Creek Terrace Inc	5:
Friends Extended Care Center	5:
Stonespring of Vandalia	5:
Dayspring of Miami Valley Hlth Care Center and Rehab	5:
Springfield Masonic Community	5:
Wooded Glen	5:
Wilmington Nursing and Rehab	4:
Ohio Living Mount Pleasant	4:
Arlington Pointe	4:
Ohio Living Quaker Heights	4:
Willow Knoll Post-Acute and Senior Living	4:
Otterbein Springboro	4:
Austin Trace Health and Rehabilitation	4:
Respiratory and Nursing Center of Dayton	4:
Dunbar Health and Rehab Center	4:
Grafton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Trinity Community at Fairborn	4:
Cypress Pointe Health Campus	4:
Villa Springfield Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ce	4:
Forest Glen Health Campus	4:
Piqua Manor	4:
Otterbein Lebanon Retirement Community	3:
Autumn Years Nursing Center	3:
Carlisle Manor Health Care Inc	3:
Kingston of Miamisburg	3:
Jamestown Place Health and Rehab	3:
Laurels of West Carrollton The	3:
Legacy Centerville	3:
Trinity Community	3:
Gem City Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Aventura at Carriage Inn	3:
Siena Woods Care Center	3:
Wright Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	3:
Brookhaven Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Grace Brethren Village	3:
Vancrest of New Carlisle	3:
The Laurels of Middletown	2:
St Leonard Hcc	2:
Legacy Miamisburg	2:
Bellbrook Health and Rehab	2:
Legacy Kettering	2:
Xenia Health and Rehab	2:
The Laurels of Kettering	2:
Oaks of West Kettering The	2:
Sanctuary at Wilmington Place	2:
Legacy Beavercreek	2:
New Lebanon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	2:
Widows Home of Dayton	2:
Maria Joseph Living Care Center	2:
Friendship Village	2:
Englewood Health and Rehab	2:
Laurels of Huber Heights The	2:
Southbrook Healthcare Center	2:
Allen View Healthcare Center	2:
Aventura at Oakwood Village	2:
Springmeade Healthcenter	2:
Troy Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	2:
Koester Pavilion	2:
Urbana Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Stillwater Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Embassy of Lebanon	1:
Majestic Care of Middletown LLC	1:
Momentous Health at Franklin	1:
Centerville Health and Rehab	1:
Wood Glen Alzheimer's Community	1:
Walnut Creek Nursing Center	1:
Village at The Greene	1:
Harmony Center For Rehabilitation and Healing	1:
Beavercreek Health and Rehab	1:
Carecore at Mary Scott	1:
Garden Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Aventura at Shiloh Springs	1:
Momentous Health at Vandalia	1:
Good Shepherd Village	1:
Springfield Nursing and Independent Living	1:
Arbors at Springfield	1:
Northwood Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:
Vancrest of Urbana, Inc	1:
Ayden Healthcare of Piqua	1:
Vienna Springs Health Campus	No Data
Hospitality Center For Rehabilitation and Healing	No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB)

There are 0 doctors and 0 medical groups that are affiliated with 88th Medical Group (Wright-Patterson AFB).