HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL

HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in GREENFIELD, IN. Its type of ownership is Government - Local. The facility's Medicare ID is 150037. It does provide emergency services. There are 220 medical professionals and 79 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $24,693. This is lower than the state average of $26,136. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	81 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	16 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	87 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	18 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	77 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	80 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	17 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	22 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	66 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	7 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	27 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	7 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	30 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	67 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	24 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	58 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	19 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	23 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	74 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	9 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	43 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	30 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	27 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	10 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	90 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	10 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	90 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	10 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	90 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	37 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	59 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	42 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	53 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	38 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	3 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	59 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	32 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	64 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	85 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	4 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	11 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	63 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	5 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	32 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	4 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	20 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	76 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	75 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	22 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$19
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$52
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$25
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$8
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$622
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$9,383
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$910
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$828
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$141
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,484
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$893
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$6,019
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$96
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,190
Total (Complete Episode)	$24,693

Infection Rates at HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	982.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	0.61 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	1,497.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	0.76 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	33.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	0.82 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	2.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	8.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.07 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	15,575.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	0.83 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.08 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.89 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	14,679.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	9.13 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	3.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.33 / Better

How HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in GREENFIELD, IN

Worst Hospitals in GREENFIELD, IN

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.8%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	11.2%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	11.7%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	16.9%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	14.1%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.37%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.24%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.42%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.51%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	9.5%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.59%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.82%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.94%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.36%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.94%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Compass Park	5:
Homeview Center of Franklin	5:
Otterbein Franklin Seniorlife Comm Res and Com Care	5:
Franklin Meadows	5:
Greenwood Village South	5:
Greenwood Health and Living Community	5:
Greenwood Meadows	5:
University Heights Health and Living Community	5:
Southpointe Healthcare Center	5:
Beech Grove Meadows	5:
Fairway Village	5:
Envive of Beech Grove	5:
Springhurst Health Campus	5:
Hamilton Trace of Fishers	5:
The Barrington of Carmel	5:
The Retreat at The Stratford	5:
Copper Trace Health and Living Community	5:
Rawlins House Health and Living Community	5:
Majestic Care of Sheridan	5:
Edgewater Woods	5:
Bethany Pointe Health Campus	5:
Aspen Trace Health and Living Community	4:
Rosegate Village	4:
Altenheim Health and Living Community	4:
St Augustine Home For The Aged	4:
Prairie Lakes Health Campus	4:
Middletown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
The Waters of Middletown Skilled Nursing Facility	4:
Countryside Manor Health and Living Community	4:
Northview Health and Living	4:
Hickory Creek at Franklin	3:
Greenwood Healthcare Center	3:
Flatrock River Lodge	3:
Morristown Manor	3:
Forest Creek Village	3:
The Waters of Indianapolis	3:
Bethany Village	3:
Arlington Place Health Campus	3:
Harrison Terrace	3:
Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care Center	3:
Westminster Village North	3:
Marquette	3:
Hickory Creek at New Castle	3:
Willows of New Castle	3:
The Waters of New Castle	3:
Harbour Manor Health and Living Community	3:
Waters of Chesterfield Skilled Nursing Facility	3:
Especially Kidz Health and Rehab	2:
Ashford Place Health Campus	2:
Homestead Healthcare Center	2:
Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care Center	2:
Rosewalk Village	2:
Miller's Merry Manor	2:
Brickyard Healthcare - Brandywine Care Center	2:
North Capitol Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Alpha Home - A Waters Community	2:
Creekside Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
American Village	2:
Majestic Care of Mccordsville	2:
Glen Oaks Health Campus	2:
Harcourt Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Allison Pointe Healthcare Center	2:
Spring Mill Meadows	2:
Brickyard Healthcare - Willow Springs Care Center	2:
The Waters of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility	2:
Clearvista Lake Health Campus	2:
Allisonville Meadows	2:
Stonebrooke Rehabilitation Center	2:
Carmel Health and Living Community	2:
Wellbrooke of Carmel	2:
Majestic Care of Carmel	2:
Bridgewater Healthcare Center	2:
Maple Park Village	2:
Wellbrooke of Westfield	2:
Beaumont Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	2:
Waldron Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	1:
Willows of Shelbyville	1:
The Waters of Rushville Skilled Nursing Facility	1:
Majestic Care of Southport	1:
Westpark A Waters Community	1:
Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Wildwood Healthcare Center	1:
Aperion Care Greenfield	1:
Greenfield Healthcare Center	1:
Tranquility Nursing and Rehab	1:
Hooverwood	1:
Castleton Health Care Center	1:
Restoracy of Carmel	1:
Mcgivney Health Care Center	1:
Riverwalk Village	1:
Envive of Anderson	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL

There are 220 doctors and 79 medical groups that are affiliated with HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL.