ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN Ratings and Reviews

About ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN

ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in LAWRENCEBURG, IN. Its type of ownership is Government - Local. The facility's Medicare ID is 150086. It does provide emergency services. There are 313 medical professionals and 51 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN, emergency patients were charged $24,400. This is lower than the state average of $26,136. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	85 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	13 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	91 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	82 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	16 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	82 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	16 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	81 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	16 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	88 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	9 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	17 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	75 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	75 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	5 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	20 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	75 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	5 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	20 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	75 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	6 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	19 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	66 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	17 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	17 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	78 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	7 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	15 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	53 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	26 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	21 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	9 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	91 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	9 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	91 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	9 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	91 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	42 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	54 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	3 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	50 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	3 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	54 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	36 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	59 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	88 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	3 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	9 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	66 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	6 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	28 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	6 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	19 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	75 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	4 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	71 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	25 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$18
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$5
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$37
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$65
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$4
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$627
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$9,513
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$9
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,224
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$547
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$69
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,482
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$793
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$6,606
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$93
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,306
Total (Complete Episode)	$24,400

Infection Rates at ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN

These measures show how often patients at ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.43 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	2,616.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	2.09 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.20 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	3.90 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	2,187.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.69 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	1.18 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	29.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	0.79 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	17.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.16 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	16,290.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	0.88 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.51 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	1.91 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	15,752.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	8.64 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	9.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	1.04 / Same

How ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in LAWRENCEBURG, IN

Worst Hospitals in LAWRENCEBURG, IN

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.9%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	12.4%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	8.4%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	9.1%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	14.7%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	14.3%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.62%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.23%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.69%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.54%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	7.83%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.03%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	5.08%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.91%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.03%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.94%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Coldspring Transitional Care Center	5:
Silver Memories Health Care	5:
St Elizabeth Ft Thomas Snf	5:
Bayley Place	5:
Beechwood Home For Incurables	5:
Marjorie P Lee Retirement Community	5:
Covenant Village of Green Township	5:
Twin Towers	5:
Ohio Living Llanfair	5:
Shawneespring Health Care Center	5:
The Home at Hearthstone	5:
Harrison Trail Health Campus	5:
Triple Creek Retirement Community	5:
Advanced Health Care of Cincinnati	5:
Jamestowne Rehabilitation	5:
Westover Retirement Community	5:
Gateway Springs Health Campus	5:
Golden Years Nursing Center	5:
Brookville Healthcare Center	5:
Woodcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
St Elizabeth Edgewood Snf	4:
Highlandspring of Ft Thomas	4:
Ridgewood Health Campus	4:
Western Hills Retirement Village	4:
Carecore at Margaret Hall	4:
Terrace View Gardens	4:
Mount Notre Dame Health Center	4:
Mt Healthy Christian Home	4:
Home at Taylor's Pointe	4:
Glendale Place Care Center	4:
Alois Alzheimer Center	4:
Sanctuary Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
St Andrews Health Campus	4:
Doverwood Village	4:
Glen Meadows	4:
Residence at Huntington Court	4:
Berkeley Square Retirement Cen	4:
Gallatin Nursing and Rehab	3:
Boonespring Transitional Care Center, LLC	3:
Florence Park Care Center	3:
Villaspring of Erlanger	3:
Madonna Manor	3:
The Pavilion at Kenton	3:
Brookside Healthcare Center	3:
Shady Nook Care Center	3:
Lincoln Crawford Care Center	3:
Scarlet Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Bridgetown Nursing and Rehabilitation Centre	3:
Norwood Towers Post-Acute	3:
Ripley Crossing	3:
Clovernook Health Care and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Maple Knoll Village	3:
Parkside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Birchwood Care Center	3:
The Waters of Rising Sun	2:
Emerald Trace	2:
The Waters of Dillsboro-Ross Manor	2:
Village Care Center	2:
Rosedale Green	2:
Carmel Manor	2:
Delhi Post-Acute	2:
Manderley Health Care Center	2:
Clifton Healthcare Center	2:
Seven Acres Senior Living at Clifton	2:
Garden Park Health Care Center	2:
Woods Edge Rehab and Nursing	2:
Harmony Court Rehab and Nursing	2:
Mt Airy Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	2:
Drake Center Inc	2:
Wellspring Health Center	2:
Burlington House Rehab and Alzheimer's Care Center	2:
Carecore at The Meadows	2:
Veranda Gardens and Assisted Living	2:
Ayden Healthcare of Fairfield	2:
The Laurels of Hamilton	2:
Hawthorn Glen Nursing Center	2:
Belmont Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Envive of Lawrenceburg	1:
Ivy Woods Healthcare Center.	1:
Aventura at West Park	1:
The Chateau at Mountain Crest Nursing and Rehab Ctr	1:
Harrison Pavilion Care Center	1:
Three Rivers Healthcare Center	1:
Pleasant Ridge Healthcare Center	1:
Lakeridge Villa Health Care Center	1:
Liberty Nursing Center of Colerain Inc	1:
The Waters of Batesville	1:
Majestic Care of Fairfield LLC	1:
Bradford Place Care Center	1:
Majestic Care of Middletown LLC	1:
Astoria Place of Cincinnati	No Data
Liberty Station Health Campus	No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN

There are 313 doctors and 51 medical groups that are affiliated with ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with ST ELIZABETH DEARBORN.