GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL

GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in GARDEN CITY, MI. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 230244. It does provide emergency services. There are 139 medical professionals and 75 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $25,726. This is higher than the state average of $24,992. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	68 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	11 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	16 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	68 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	63 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	16 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	70 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	77 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	9 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	14 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	69 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	65 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	14 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	53 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	18 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	29 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	48 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	19 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	33 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	56 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	19 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	25 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	48 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	32 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	20 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	67 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	14 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	19 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	29 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	49 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	22 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	24 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	76 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	28 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	72 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	20 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	80 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	44 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	11 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	45 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	50 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	18 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	32 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	40 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	53 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	69 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	13 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	18 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	52 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	18 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	30 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	19 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	26 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	55 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	16 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	51 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	33 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$24
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$36
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$87
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$9
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$7
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$629
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$10,985
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$16
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,406
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$646
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$139
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$6,487
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$604
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$2,891
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$96
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,663
Total (Complete Episode)	$25,726

Infection Rates at GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.46 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	2,167.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	2.05 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	0.66 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	4,749.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	4.54 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	29.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	0.80 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	16.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.14 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.04 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	4.34 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	25,725.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	1.14 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.88 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.03 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.48 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	25,458.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	13.67 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	2.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.15 / Better

How GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in GARDEN CITY, MI

Worst Hospitals in GARDEN CITY, MI

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.7%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	13.7%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	10.9%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	7.8%	Better
Death rate for pneumonia patients	16.3%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	13%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.16%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	163.45%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.21%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.25%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.54%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	6.98%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	2.77%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.85%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.93%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.98%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.76%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Lourdes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	5:
Qualicare Nursing Home	5:
Glacier Hills	5:
The Villa at Great Lakes Crossing	5:
Bellbrook	5:
Sheffield Manor Nursing and Rehab Center	5:
Medilodge of Plymouth	5:
Marywood Nursing Care Center	5:
Shelby Crossing Health Campus	5:
Fairlane Senior Care and Rehab Center	5:
Maple Manor Rehab Center	5:
Hartford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5:
The Rivers Health and Rehab Center of Grosse Pointe	5:
The Neighborhoods of White Lake	5:
Ch Rehab and Nurs Cnt - Commons Dearborn	5:
Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5:
Fraser Villa	5:
The Orchards at Samaritan	5:
Oakpointe Senior Care and Rehab Center	5:
Martha T Berry Mcf	4:
Hamilton Nursing Home	4:
Westlake Health Campus	4:
South Lyon Senior Care and Rehab Center, L L C	4:
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse Pointe	4:
Medilodge of Taylor	4:
Rivergate Health Care Center	4:
Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Regency Heights-Detroit	4:
Medilodge of Milford	4:
Skld Livonia	4:
Riverview Health and Rehab Center	4:
Fox Run Village	4:
Caretel Inns of Brighton	4:
St Anthony Healthcare Center	4:
Wellbridge of Rochester Hills	4:
Livonia Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
Oakland Nursing Center	4:
The Villa at Parkridge	4:
Aerius Health Center	4:
Allegria Village	4:
Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center	4:
The Gilbert Residence	4:
West Oaks Senior Care and Rehab Center	4:
Pomeroy Living Rochester Skilled Rehabilitation	3:
Pomeroy Living Sterling Skilled Rehabilitation	3:
Ch Rehab and Nurs Cnt - Commons Farmington Hills	3:
Wellbridge of Novi, LLC	3:
Regency at St Clair Shores	3:
The Villa at Green Lake Estates	3:
The Lodge at Taylor	3:
Cherry Hill For Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLC	3:
Heritage Manor Nursing and Rehab Center	3:
Optalis Health and Rehab of Sterling Heights	3:
Novi Lakes Health Campus	3:
West Bloomfield Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Rivergate Terrace	3:
Church of Christ Care Center	3:
Regency at Bluffs Park	3:
Maple Manor Rehab Center of Novi Inc	3:
Regency at Livonia	3:
Oakland Manor Nursing and Rehab Center LLC	3:
St Joseph's, A Villa Center	3:
Regency at Westland	3:
Optalis Health and Rehab of Dearborn Heights	3:
The Villa at The Park	3:
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Canton	3:
Westland, A Villa Center	3:
Mission Point Nsg and Physical Rehab Ctr of Detroit	3:
The Orchards at Redford	3:
Regency at Chene	2:
Four Seasons Nursing Center of Westland	2:
Regency at Whitmore Lake	2:
The Orchards at Southgate	2:
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Troy	2:
Beaconshire Nursing Centre	2:
Ambassador, A Villa Center	2:
The Manor of Farmington Hills	2:
Evangelical Home - Saline	2:
Four Chaplains Nrsg Care Ctr	2:
Regency Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Warren	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab of Superior Woods	2:
Medilodge of Farmington	2:
Regency at Canton	2:
Father Murray, A Villa Center	2:
The Orchards at Roseville	2:
Shorepointe Nursing Center	2:
The Lakeland Center	2:
Lahser Hills Care Centre	2:
Medilodge of Southfield	2:
Shelby Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Woodward Hills Health and Rehabilitation Ctr	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Woodward	2:
Autumn Woods Residential Hlth	2:
Applewood Nursing Center Inc	2:
Omni Continuing Care	2:
Lakepointe Senior Care and Rehab Center, L L C	2:
Marvin and Betty Danto Health Care Center	2:
Notting Hill of West Bloomfield	2:

Medical Groups Affiliated with GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL

There are 139 doctors and 75 medical groups that are affiliated with GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL.