BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS Ratings and Reviews

About BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS

BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in FARMINGTON HILLS, MI. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 230151. It does provide emergency services. There are 854 medical professionals and 257 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS, emergency patients were charged $25,790. This is higher than the state average of $24,992. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	83 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	70 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	24 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	20 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	14 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	72 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	23 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	72 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	22 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	56 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	28 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	52 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	33 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	60 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	17 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	23 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	52 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	30 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	18 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	67 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	16 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	37 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	43 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	20 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	86 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	88 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	83 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	51 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	41 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	57 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	33 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	52 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	41 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	42 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	50 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	57 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	20 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	23 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	47 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	21 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	32 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	13 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	28 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	59 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	9 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	58 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	33 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$19
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$39
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$62
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$19
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$17
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$678
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$10,527
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$22
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,789
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$832
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$183
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,640
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$691
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,247
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$132
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,893
Total (Complete Episode)	$25,790

Infection Rates at BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS

These measures show how often patients at BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.72 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	3.24 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	4,688.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	4.27 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	7.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	1.64 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.14 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.05 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	8,780.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	9.16 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	4.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.44 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	1.02 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	4.62 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	111.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	3.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	7.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery	2.34 / Worse
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	72.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.64 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.75 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	3.83 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	56,797.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	3.26 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	6.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	1.84 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.34 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.99 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	55,603.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	23.21 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	14.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.60 / Better

How BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in FARMINGTON HILLS, MI

Worst Hospitals in FARMINGTON HILLS, MI

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.7%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	12%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	7.2%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	12%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	15.8%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	14.3%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.42%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	160.05%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.31%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.3%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.5%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	7.96%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.35%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.6%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.84%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.49%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.9%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
The Neighborhoods of White Lake	5:
The Orchards at Samaritan	5:
Shelby Crossing Health Campus	5:
Fox Run Village	5:
Aerius Health Center	5:
Maple Manor Rehab Center	5:
Glacier Hills	5:
Qualicare Nursing Home	5:
Bellbrook	5:
Fairlane Senior Care and Rehab Center	5:
Fraser Villa	5:
Wellbridge of Romeo, LLC	5:
Hartford Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5:
Westlake Health Campus	5:
Medilodge of Plymouth	5:
Lourdes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	5:
The Rivers Health and Rehab Center of Grosse Pointe	5:
Marywood Nursing Care Center	5:
South Lyon Senior Care and Rehab Center, L L C	5:
The Gilbert Residence	4:
Skld Livonia	4:
Novi Lakes Health Campus	4:
Oakland Nursing Center	4:
Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Martha T Berry Mcf	4:
Medilodge of Taylor	4:
Wellbridge of Clarkston	4:
Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Medilodge of Milford	4:
The Villa at Great Lakes Crossing	4:
Pomeroy Living Sterling Skilled Rehabilitation	4:
Livonia Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
Caretel Inns of Brighton	4:
St Anthony Healthcare Center	4:
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse Pointe	4:
Lake Orion Nursing Center	4:
Sheffield Manor Nursing and Rehab Center	4:
Ch Rehab and Nurs Cnt - Commons Dearborn	4:
Rivergate Health Care Center	4:
West Bloomfield Health and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center	4:
West Oaks Senior Care and Rehab Center	4:
Optalis Health and Rehab of Sterling Heights	4:
Wellbridge of Rochester Hills	4:
Oakpointe Senior Care and Rehab Center	4:
Regency Heights-Detroit	3:
Shelby Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Pomeroy Living Rochester Skilled Rehabilitation	3:
Riverview Health and Rehab Center	3:
Skld Plymouth	3:
Ch Rehab and Nurs Cnt - Commons Farmington Hills	3:
Wellbridge of Novi, LLC	3:
Regency at St Clair Shores	3:
Hamilton Nursing Home	3:
The Lodge at Taylor	3:
Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLC	3:
Father Murray, A Villa Center	3:
Heritage Manor Nursing and Rehab Center	3:
Oakland Manor Nursing and Rehab Center LLC	3:
Church of Christ Care Center	3:
Cherry Hill For Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Windemere Park Health and Rehab Center	3:
Regency at Bluffs Park	3:
Omni Continuing Care	3:
Maple Manor Rehab Center of Novi Inc	3:
Fenton Healthcare	3:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Holly	3:
Regency at Livonia	3:
St Joseph's, A Villa Center	3:
The Villa at Parkridge	3:
Regency at Westland	3:
Optalis Health and Rehab of Dearborn Heights	3:
The Orchards at Northwest	3:
Allegria Village	3:
Regency at Shelby Township	3:
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park	3:
Westland, A Villa Center	3:
Rivergate Terrace	3:
Mission Point Nsg and Physical Rehab Ctr of Detroit	3:
Regency at Chene	2:
Four Seasons Nursing Center of Westland	2:
Regency Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Regency at Whitmore Lake	2:
Beaconshire Nursing Centre	2:
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Troy	2:
Ambassador, A Villa Center	2:
The Manor of Farmington Hills	2:
Evangelical Home - Saline	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Warren	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab of Superior Woods	2:
Medilodge of Farmington	2:
Regency at Canton	2:
The Orchards at Roseville	2:
Shorepointe Nursing Center	2:
The Lakeland Center	2:
Lahser Hills Care Centre	2:
Medilodge of Southfield	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Elmwood	2:
Applewood Nursing Center Inc	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Woodward	2:

Medical Groups Affiliated with BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS

There are 854 doctors and 257 medical groups that are affiliated with BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with BEAUMONT FARMINGTON HILLS.