ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL

ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in GRAND BLANC, MI. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Church. The facility's Medicare ID is 230197. It does provide emergency services. There are 392 medical professionals and 139 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $26,313. This is higher than the state average of $24,992. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	74 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	21 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	80 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	17 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	71 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	22 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	70 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	24 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	72 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	22 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	82 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	69 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	24 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	66 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	26 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	60 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	31 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	58 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	10 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	32 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	61 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	30 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	52 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	27 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	21 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	70 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	13 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	35 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	42 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	23 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	86 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	85 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	86 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	46 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	48 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	54 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	39 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	49 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	39 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	56 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	58 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	18 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	24 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	51 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	14 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	35 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	10 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	29 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	61 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	8 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	65 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	27 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$14
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$43
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$103
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$13
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$15
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$721
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11,732
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$39
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,868
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$730
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$264
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,096
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$817
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,786
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$134
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,938
Total (Complete Episode)	$26,313

Infection Rates at ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.56 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.51 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	5,172.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	5.51 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	7.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	1.27 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.14 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.03 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	7,543.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	9.37 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	4.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.43 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.26 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.60 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	265.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	6.93 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	5.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.72 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	0.03 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	2.96 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	191.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	1.66 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	0.60 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.18 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.36 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	83,629.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	7.10 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	4.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.56 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.36 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.75 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	72,599.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	53.45 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	28.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.52 / Better

How ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in GRAND BLANC, MI

Worst Hospitals in GRAND BLANC, MI

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.9%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	14.2%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	3.8%	SAME
Death rate for COPD patients	7%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	11.5%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	16.6%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	12%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.39%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	199.62%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.23%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	3.55%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.76%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	11.21%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.4%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.38%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.66%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.24%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.99%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
The Willows at Howell	5:
The Neighborhoods of White Lake	5:
Lourdes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	5:
Bellbrook	5:
The Oaks at Woodfield	5:
Durand Senior Care and Rehab Center, L L C	5:
Regency at Grand Blanc	5:
Mclaren Lapeer Region	5:
Wellbridge of Brighton	4:
Medilodge of Milford	4:
Westlake Health Campus	4:
Medilodge of Livingston	4:
Wellbridge of Clarkston	4:
Lake Orion Nursing Center	4:
West Bloomfield Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
The Villa at Green Lake Estates	3:
Pomeroy Living Rochester Skilled Rehabilitation	3:
Oakland Manor Nursing and Rehab Center LLC	3:
Argentine Care Center	3:
Fenton Healthcare	3:
Medilodge of Grand Blanc	3:
Briarwood Nursing and Rehab	3:
The Villages of Lapeer Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Lapeer County Medical Care Fac	3:
Maple Woods Manor	3:
Notting Hill of West Bloomfield	2:
Marvin and Betty Danto Health Care Center	2:
Woodward Hills Health and Rehabilitation Ctr	2:
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Troy	2:
The Villa at Silverbell Estates	2:
Mission Point Nursing and Rehab Center of Holly	2:
Wellbridge of Fenton	2:
Wellbridge of Grand Blanc	2:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Flint	2:
Willowbrook Manor	2:
Stonegate Health Campus	2:
Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Skld West Bloomfield	1:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Clawson	1:
Skld Bloomfield Hills	1:
West Hickory Haven	1:
Medilodge of Howell	1:
Regency at Waterford	1:
Canterbury On The Lake	1:
The Springs at Rochester Hills Rehab and Nursing Ctr	1:
Mission Point Nsg and Phy Rehab Ctr of Clarkston	1:
Caretel Inns of Linden	1:
Kith Haven	1:
Majestic Care of Flushing	1:
Medilodge of Montrose Inc	1:
Regency at Troy	No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL

There are 392 doctors and 139 medical groups that are affiliated with ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL.