FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL

FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in BURNSVILLE, MN. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Church. The facility's Medicare ID is 240207. It does provide emergency services. There are 586 medical professionals and 65 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $22,178. This is lower than the state average of $25,515. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	17 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	88 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	9 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	22 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	22 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	18 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	1 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	71 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	24 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	55 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	11 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	34 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	55 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	10 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	35 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	55 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	12 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	33 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	58 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	21 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	21 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	75 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	8 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	41 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	34 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	25 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	85 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	84 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	86 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	49 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	54 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	40 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	33 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	60 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	61 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	15 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	24 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	53 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	12 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	35 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	11 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	26 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	63 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	8 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	62 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	30 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$9
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$36
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$82
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$5
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$30
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$690
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11,280
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$23
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,254
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$763
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$194
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$2,254
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$949
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,227
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$115
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,266
Total (Complete Episode)	$22,178

Infection Rates at FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.01 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.24 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	5,774.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	3.98 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.25 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.09 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.82 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	5,075.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	3.63 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.55 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.10 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.93 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	138.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	3.43 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.58 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	89.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.63 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.49 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	51,628.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	2.01 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.27 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.95 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	43,611.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	18.75 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	10.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.53 / Better

How FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in BURNSVILLE, MN

Worst Hospitals in BURNSVILLE, MN

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	11.8%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	9.1%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	10.1%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	14.2%	Better
Death rate for stroke patients	13.5%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.21%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.22%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.5%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.47%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	6.17%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.19%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.41%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.82%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.87%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.75%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Mount Olivet Home	5:
Trinity Care Center	5:
Folkestone	5:
Harmony Gardens	5:
Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes Trp	5:
Friendship Village of Bloomington	5:
Augustana Chapel View Care Center	5:
Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington	5:
The Birches at Trillium Woods	5:
Norris Square	5:
Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center	5:
Haven Homes of Maple Plain	5:
Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care and Rehab Ctr	5:
Fairview University Trans Serv	5:
Shakopee Friendship Manor	5:
Good Samaritan Ambassador	5:
Sholom Home West	5:
Langton Shores	5:
The Lutheran Home: Belle Plaine	5:
Flagstone	5:
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake	5:
Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation	5:
Capitol View Transitional Care Center	5:
Andrew Residence	4:
Mn Veterans Home Minneapolis	4:
Hayes Residence	4:
Redeemer Residence Inc	4:
The Gables of Boutwells Landing	4:
Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills	4:
Three Links Care Center	4:
The Villas at Brookview	4:
Aurora On France	4:
Ebenezer Integrated Care and Rehab	4:
Mala Strana Care and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Mount Olivet Careview Home	4:
Apple Valley Village Health Care Center	4:
Prescott Nursing and Rehab Community	3:
Hopkins Health Services	3:
St Anthony Park Home Inc	3:
Catholic Eldercare On Main	3:
Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center	3:
Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood	3:
Allina Health Restorative Suites	3:
The Villas at Roseville	3:
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community	3:
Lake Minnetonka Shores	3:
Little Sisters of The Poor	3:
The Estates at Greeley LLC	3:
The Estates at Linden LLC	3:
Auburn Manor	3:
St Therese Home	3:
St Therese of Woodbury LLC	3:
The Estates at Excelsior LLC	3:
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck	3:
Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota	3:
Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge Ii	3:
Regina Senior Living	3:
Martin Luther Care Center	3:
Central Health Care Center	3:
Episcopal Church Home The Gardens	3:
Lyngblomsten Care Center	2:
The Estates at Bloomington LLC	2:
Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East	2:
Carondelet Village Care Center	2:
Maplewood Rehabilitation Center	2:
The Villas at Richfield	2:
The Estates at Roseville LLC	2:
The Estates at St Louis Park LLC	2:
Birchwood Care Home	2:
The Villas at The Park	2:
The Villas at The Cedars	2:
Jones Harrison Residence	2:
Cerenity Care Center White Bear Lake	2:
The Estates at Chateau LLC	2:
The Villas at St Louis Park	1:
Highland Chateau Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Benedictine Health Center of Minneapolis	1:
Woodbury Health Care Center	1:
The Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC	1:
Hope Springs at Minnetonka	1:
Grand Avenue Rest Home	1:
The Villas at Robbinsdale	1:
Mission Nursing Home	1:
Cerenity Care Center On Humboldt	1:
Lakehouse Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Providence Place	1:
Bywood East Health Care	1:
Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center	1:
St Anthony Health and Rehabilitation	1:
Good Samaritan Society Inver Grove Heights	1:
St Gertrudes Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Crest View Lutheran Home	1:
North Ridge Health and Rehab	1:
New Brighton Care Center	1:
Southview Acres Healthcare Center	1:
Cerenity Marian of St Paul LLC	1:
Edenbrook of Edina	1:
The Emeralds at St Paul LLC	1:
Good Samaritan Society - Stillwater	1:
The Villas at New Brighton	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL

There are 586 doctors and 65 medical groups that are affiliated with FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with FAIRVIEW RIDGES HOSPITAL.