CONTACT INFORMATION REVIEWS & MORE DATA

MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

  • Date Updated:  July 31, 2024
  • Address:  9875 HOSPITAL DRIVE, MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369
  • Phone:  (763) 581-1563
  • Type:  Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership:  Voluntary non-profit - Private
  • Overall Rating:  
  • Perc. Patients Recommending:   80%

  About MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL

MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in MAPLE GROVE, MN. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 240214. It does provide emergency services. There are 311 medical professionals and 51 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $19,463. This is lower than the state average of $25,515. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 19 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 86 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 74 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 22 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 81 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 16 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 19 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 28 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 60 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 31 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 66 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 26 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 63 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 17 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 20 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 80 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 6 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 14 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 46 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 27 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 27 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 13 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 87 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 84 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 89 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 44 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 51 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 49 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 45 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 50 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 60 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 68 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 10 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 22 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 71 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 5 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 24 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 6 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 15 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 79 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 80 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 17 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $14
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $29
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $245
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $4
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $4
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $538
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $10,156
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $15
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $909
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $698
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $255
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,250
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $711
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,504
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $146
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $984
Total (Complete Episode) $19,463

Infection Rates at MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.03 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 2.57 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 2,060.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 1.92 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 1.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.52 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit -- / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.77 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 2,051.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 1.69 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit 0.04 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit 3.56 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 54.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 1.39 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 1.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery 0.72 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 96.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 0.72 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 2.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.03 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 2.70 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 49,766.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 1.83 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 1.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia 0.55 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.18 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.93 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 32,625.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 13.46 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 6.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.45 / Better

How MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in MAPLE GROVE, MN

Worst Hospitals in MAPLE GROVE, MN

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients 9.2% SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients 13% Better
Death rate for stroke patients NA Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate 0.36% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications NA Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.24% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.09% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.34% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.47% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 8.8% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.13% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 5.33% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 2.46% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.33% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.92% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center 5:
Flagstone 5:
Sholom Home West 5:
Haven Homes of Maple Plain 5:
Meadows On Fairview 5:
Shakopee Friendship Manor 5:
Fairview University Trans Serv 5:
Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care and Rehab Ctr 5:
Park View Care Center 5:
Norris Square 5:
Folkestone 5:
Lake Ridge Care Center of Buffalo, Inc. 5:
The Villas at Brookview 5:
Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes Trp 5:
Mount Olivet Home 5:
Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington 5:
The Birches at Trillium Woods 5:
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake 5:
Capitol View Transitional Care Center 5:
Friendship Village of Bloomington 5:
Langton Shores 5:
Guardian Angels Care Center 5:
Good Samaritan Ambassador 5:
Park River Estates Care Center 5:
Augustana Chapel View Care Center 5:
Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills 4:
Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood 4:
Aurora On France 4:
Redeemer Residence Inc 4:
St Therese Home 4:
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck 4:
Presbyterian Homes of North Oaks 4:
Ebenezer Integrated Care and Rehab 4:
Episcopal Church Home The Gardens 4:
Andrew Residence 4:
Cura of Monticello 4:
Hayes Residence 4:
Harmony Gardens 4:
Hopkins Health Services 4:
Allina Health Restorative Suites 3:
The Villas at Roseville 3:
Little Sisters of The Poor 3:
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community 3:
The Estates at Excelsior LLC 3:
Good Samaritan Society - Waconia and Westview Acre 3:
Lake Minnetonka Shores 3:
Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge Ii 3:
Martin Luther Care Center 3:
Auburn Manor 3:
Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota 3:
Mount Olivet Careview Home 3:
The Villas at St Paul 3:
Mn Veterans Home Minneapolis 3:
Auburn Home In Waconia 3:
Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East 3:
Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center 3:
Lyngblomsten Care Center 3:
St Anthony Park Home Inc 3:
Catholic Eldercare On Main 3:
Cerenity Care Center On Humboldt 2:
The Estates at Bloomington LLC 2:
Maplewood Rehabilitation Center 2:
Mission Nursing Home 2:
The Estates at Roseville LLC 2:
Birchwood Care Home 2:
Cerenity Marian of St Paul LLC 2:
The Villas at The Park 2:
The Emeralds at St Paul LLC 2:
The Villas at New Brighton 2:
The Villas at The Cedars 2:
Maranatha Care Center 2:
Cerenity Care Center White Bear Lake 2:
Southside Care Center 2:
The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC 2:
The Estates at Chateau LLC 2:
The Villas at Richfield 2:
Carondelet Village Care Center 2:
Lakehouse Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 1:
Southview Acres Healthcare Center 1:
Providence Place 1:
The Villas at Robbinsdale 1:
Edenbrook of Edina 1:
St Gertrudes Health and Rehabilitation Center 1:
The Estates at St Louis Park LLC 1:
The Estates at Delano LLC 1:
Bywood East Health Care 1:
St Anthony Health and Rehabilitation 1:
Crest View Lutheran Home 1:
North Ridge Health and Rehab 1:
New Brighton Care Center 1:
The Estates at Fridley LLC 1:
Jones Harrison Residence 1:
Highland Chateau Health and Rehabilitation Center 1:
The Villas at Osseo LLC 1:
Birchwood Health Care Center 1:
The Estates at Lynnhurst LLC 1:
Hope Springs at Minnetonka 1:
The Villas at St Louis Park 1:
Benedictine Health Center of Minneapolis 1:
Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center 1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL

There are 311 doctors and 51 medical groups that are affiliated with MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups


The list of medical professionals associated with MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with MAPLE GROVE HOSPITAL.

Healthcare Search Options

Make informed decisions about your healthcare options

Our site is designed to help you find the information you need quickly and easily, no matter what type of healthcare provider you're looking for. We provide a wealth of statistics and data that can help you make informed decisions about your healthcare options.

SEARCH OUR HEALTHCARE DATABASES

Home Healthcare

Nursing Homes

Owners & Operators

Dialysis

Hospitals

Doctor Groups

Doctors

Hospice

Purchase a Marketing or Other Report from our Database

We can provide custom data reports based on our database of skilled nursing facilities. Anything from emails to spreadsheets to an API. Bring the data directly into Salesforce or any other CRM.

  • Facility Name
  • Owner Name
  • Mailing Address
  • Contact Information
  • Phone Numbers
  • Website Addresses
  • File Formats: .xls, .csv, .txt
  • APIs

Reports updated monthly.

Request Report Pricing