PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL

PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 240053. It does provide emergency services. There are 1,378 medical professionals and 82 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $23,742. This is lower than the state average of $25,515. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	18 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	76 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	20 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	74 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	82 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	14 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	88 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	9 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	81 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	15 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	75 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	20 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	65 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	27 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	64 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	7 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	29 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	65 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	26 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	57 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	22 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	21 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	72 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	10 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	18 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	42 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	34 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	24 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	85 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	83 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	13 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	87 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	41 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	53 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	46 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	52 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	60 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	70 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	10 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	20 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	61 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	7 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	32 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	6 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	18 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	76 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	4 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	77 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	19 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$60
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$337
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$8
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$570
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11,865
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,319
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$775
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$267
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$2,098
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$827
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,200
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$75
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,304
Total (Complete Episode)	$23,742

Infection Rates at PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.03 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	0.60 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	10,738.00 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	10.97 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	2.00 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.18 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.31 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.28 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	9,359.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	11.85 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	8.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.68 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.20 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.48 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	264.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	6.53 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	4.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.61 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	0.18 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	3.61 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	250.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	1.83 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	1.09 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	0.66 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	111,665.00 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	4.51 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	0.00 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia	0.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.19 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.44 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	105,144.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	71.37 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	21.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.29 / Better

How PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN

Worst Hospitals in SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.3%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	13.7%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	3.3%	SAME
Death rate for COPD patients	10.1%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	11.3%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	16.3%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	14.7%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.43%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	210.58%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.16%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.66%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.32%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	6.44%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	4.78%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.17%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	2.07%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.87%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.87%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Shakopee Friendship Manor	5:
The Birches at Trillium Woods	5:
Presbyterian Homes of Bloomington	5:
Langton Shores	5:
Norris Square	5:
Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center	5:
Trinity Care Center	5:
Sholom Home West	5:
St Therese of Woodbury LLC	5:
Friendship Village of Bloomington	5:
Capitol View Transitional Care Center	5:
Mount Olivet Home	5:
Park View Care Center	5:
Folkestone	5:
Good Samaritan Ambassador	5:
Augustana Chapel View Care Center	5:
Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation	5:
The Lutheran Home: Belle Plaine	5:
Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care and Rehab Ctr	5:
Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institutes Trp	5:
Flagstone	5:
Park River Estates Care Center	5:
Haven Homes of Maple Plain	5:
Fairview University Trans Serv	5:
The Villas at Brookview	5:
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake	5:
Andrew Residence	4:
Aurora On France	4:
Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood	4:
Hopkins Health Services	4:
Harmony Gardens	4:
Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills	4:
St Therese Home	4:
Hayes Residence	4:
Ebenezer Integrated Care and Rehab	4:
Redeemer Residence Inc	4:
Episcopal Church Home The Gardens	4:
Presbyterian Homes of North Oaks	4:
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck	4:
Mn Veterans Home Minneapolis	3:
Lyngblomsten Care Center	3:
St Anthony Park Home Inc	3:
Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East	3:
Catholic Eldercare On Main	3:
Allina Health Restorative Suites	3:
The Villas at Roseville	3:
Auburn Manor	3:
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community	3:
Lake Minnetonka Shores	3:
Good Samaritan Society - Waconia and Westview Acre	3:
Martin Luther Care Center	3:
Little Sisters of The Poor	3:
Apple Valley Village Health Care Center	3:
Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center	3:
The Estates at Excelsior LLC	3:
Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center	3:
Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge Ii	3:
Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota	3:
Mount Olivet Careview Home	3:
The Villas at St Paul	3:
Auburn Home In Waconia	3:
Carondelet Village Care Center	2:
The Villas at Richfield	2:
Maplewood Rehabilitation Center	2:
Cerenity Care Center On Humboldt	2:
Mission Nursing Home	2:
The Estates at Roseville LLC	2:
The Villas at The Park	2:
Regina Senior Living	2:
Birchwood Care Home	2:
The Villas at New Brighton	2:
Cerenity Marian of St Paul LLC	2:
Maranatha Care Center	2:
The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC	2:
The Emeralds at St Paul LLC	2:
The Villas at The Cedars	2:
Southside Care Center	2:
The Estates at Bloomington LLC	2:
Cerenity Care Center White Bear Lake	2:
The Estates at Chateau LLC	2:
Hope Springs at Minnetonka	1:
The Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC	1:
Grand Avenue Rest Home	1:
The Villas at Robbinsdale	1:
Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center	1:
Lakehouse Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Providence Place	1:
Good Samaritan Society Inver Grove Heights	1:
Bywood East Health Care	1:
St Anthony Health and Rehabilitation	1:
Crest View Lutheran Home	1:
The Estates at St Louis Park LLC	1:
North Ridge Health and Rehab	1:
Southview Acres Healthcare Center	1:
New Brighton Care Center	1:
Edenbrook of Edina	1:
The Villas at Osseo LLC	1:
The Estates at Fridley LLC	1:
Jones Harrison Residence	1:
The Estates at Lynnhurst LLC	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL

There are 1,378 doctors and 82 medical groups that are affiliated with PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with PARK NICOLLET METHODIST HOSPITAL.