RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL

RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in OAK PARK, IL. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Church. The facility's Medicare ID is 140063. It does provide emergency services. There are 508 medical professionals and 79 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $21,896. This is lower than the state average of $25,739. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	77 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	17 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	16 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	12 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	77 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	77 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	18 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	59 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	26 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	56 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	30 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	62 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	22 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	59 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	21 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	20 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	75 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	9 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	16 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	43 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	34 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	23 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	19 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	81 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	21 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	79 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	84 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	47 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	50 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	40 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	39 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	53 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	63 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	12 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	25 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	56 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	15 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	29 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	13 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	24 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	63 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	8 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	63 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	29 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$25
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$34
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$86
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$3
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$540
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$9,741
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$16
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,270
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$828
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$172
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,444
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,059
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$2,896
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$152
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,618
Total (Complete Episode)	$21,896

Infection Rates at RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.04 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	3.79 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	1,618.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.30 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.77 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.92 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	1,563.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.56 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	28.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	0.76 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	28.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.26 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	24,238.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	0.96 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.21 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.86 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	24,238.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	17.73 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	8.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.45 / Better

How RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in OAK PARK, IL

Worst Hospitals in OAK PARK, IL

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	12.5%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	9.1%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	8.1%	Better
Death rate for pneumonia patients	11.2%	Better
Death rate for stroke patients	11.6%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	1.32%	Worse
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.3%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	3.13%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.52%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	8.63%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.26%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	6.35%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.9%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.94%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.22%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Burgess Square Healthcare Ctr	5:
Gottlieb Memorial Hospital	5:
West Suburban Medical Ctr	5:
The Admiral at The Lake	5:
Alden Estates of Shorewood	5:
The Springs at Monarch Landing	5:
St Joseph Village of Chicago	5:
Citadel Care Center-Wilmette	5:
Terraces at The Clare	5:
Whitehall of Deerfield	5:
Aperion Care Fox River	5:
Celebrate Senior Living Niles	5:
Thrive of Lisle	5:
Selfhelp Home of Chicago	5:
Avantara Long Grove	5:
Encore Village	5:
Victorian Village Hlth and Well	5:
Little Sisters of The Poor	5:
Wynscape Health and Rehab	5:
Park Place Christian Community	5:
Radford Green	5:
Avantara Lake Zurich	5:
Ascension Casa Scalabrini	5:
Brandel Health and Rehab	5:
Central Baptist Village	5:
Mercy Circle	5:
Alden Estates of Evanston	5:
Community First Medical Center	5:
Vi at The Glen	5:
Westminster Place	5:
Niles Nsg and Rehab Ctr	5:
Ascension Nazarethville Place	5:
Alden Des Plaines Rehab and Hc	5:
Thrive of Fox Valley	5:
The Grove of Skokie	5:
Dupage Care Center	5:
Little Sisters of The Poor of Palatine	5:
Oak Trace	5:
Alden Estates of Skokie	5:
The Mather Evanston	5:
Alden Long Grove Rehab and hc Ctr	5:
Ascension Resurrection Life	4:
Ignite Medical Hanover Park	4:
Norwood Crossing	4:
Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf	4:
Aperion Care Wesley	4:
The Oaks Health Care Center	4:
Pearl of Evanston,the	4:
Elevate Care Palos Heights	4:
St Patrick's Residence	4:
Healthbridge of Arlington Hts	4:
Franciscan Village	4:
Arista Healthcare	4:
Buckingham Pavilion	4:
Tabor Hills Health Care Fac	4:
Alden Poplar Creek Rehab and Hcc	4:
Astoria Place Living and Rehab	4:
Asbury Court Nursing and Rehab	4:
Winston Manor Cnv and Nursing	4:
Ahva Care of Winfield	4:
Ascension Saint Benedict	4:
Prairieview at The Garlands	4:
Grove of Northbrook,the	4:
Lakewood Nrsg and Rehab Center	4:
Beacon Hill	4:
Plymouth Place	4:
Greek American Rehab Care Ctr	4:
The British Home	4:
Avantara Chicago Ridge	4:
Park Ridge Healthcare Center	4:
Alden Courts of Shorewood	4:
Elevate Care Northbrook	4:
Aperion Care Plum Grove	4:
Bella Terra Streamwood	4:
Alden Courts of Waterford	4:
Alden Estates of Northmoor	3:
Pearl of Rolling Meadows,the	3:
Citadel of Glenview,the	3:
Elevate Care Abington	3:
Eden Vista Propect Heights	3:
Balmoral Home	3:
All American Vlge Nrsg and Rhb	3:
The Citadel of Northbrook	3:
Eden Vista Burr Ridge	3:
Ahva Care of Stickney	3:
Aliya of Evanston	3:
Alden Lincoln Rehab and H C Ctr	3:
The Grove of Evanston L and R	3:
Grove of Fox Valley,the	3:
Meadowbrook Manor	3:
Bella Terra Elmhurst	3:
Warren Barr Gold Coast	3:
Smith Village	3:
Bella Terra Lagrange	3:
Covenant Living - Windsor Park	3:
Dobson Plaza	3:
Meadowbrook Manor - Lagrange	3:
The Waterford Care Center	3:
Birchwood Plaza	3:
Clark Manor	3:

Medical Groups Affiliated with RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL

There are 508 doctors and 79 medical groups that are affiliated with RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with RUSH OAK PARK HOSPITAL.