ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL

ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in CHICAGO, IL. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Other. The facility's Medicare ID is 140048. It does provide emergency services. There are 643 medical professionals and 150 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $25,228. This is lower than the state average of $25,739. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	76 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	16 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	82 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	74 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	18 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	9 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	16 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	77 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	17 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	74 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	20 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	58 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	26 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	57 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	27 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	58 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	26 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	59 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	25 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	16 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	75 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	11 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	14 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	43 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	40 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	17 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	83 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	83 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	84 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	44 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	46 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	49 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	13 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	38 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	46 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	9 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	56 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	65 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	14 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	21 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	58 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	13 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	29 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	13 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	28 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	59 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	11 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	53 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	36 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$26
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$9
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$70
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$20
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$7
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$750
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$10,984
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,854
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$857
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$161
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,299
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,059
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,186
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$117
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,818
Total (Complete Episode)	$25,228

Infection Rates at ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.46 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.87 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	8,900.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	8.13 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	8.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.99 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.30 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.53 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	7,710.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	8.17 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	6.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.74 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	1.51 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	5.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	145.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	3.82 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	11.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery	2.88 / Worse
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	79.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.78 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.09 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.73 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	88,175.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	3.82 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.52 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.12 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.45 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	86,705.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	36.82 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	9.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.24 / Better

How ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in CHICAGO, IL

Worst Hospitals in CHICAGO, IL

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	10.9%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	9.4%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	8.2%	Better
Death rate for pneumonia patients	15.7%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	11.1%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.35%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	164.68%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.34%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.52%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.42%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	16.02%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	6.56%	Worse
Postoperative sepsis rate	6.14%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.72%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.84%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.31%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Alden Des Plaines Rehab and Hc	5:
Vi at The Glen	5:
Miller's Merry Manor	5:
Oak Trace	5:
Park Place Christian Community	5:
St Joseph Village of Chicago	5:
Victorian Village Hlth and Well	5:
Gottlieb Memorial Hospital	5:
Niles Nsg and Rehab Ctr	5:
Selfhelp Home of Chicago	5:
The Admiral at The Lake	5:
The Grove of Skokie	5:
Citadel Care Center-Wilmette	5:
West Suburban Medical Ctr	5:
Celebrate Senior Living Niles	5:
Ascension Casa Scalabrini	5:
Alden Estates of Skokie	5:
Community First Medical Center	5:
Alden Estates of Evanston	5:
Westminster Place	5:
The Mather Evanston	5:
Terraces at The Clare	5:
Little Sisters of The Poor	5:
Burgess Square Healthcare Ctr	5:
Ascension Nazarethville Place	5:
Central Baptist Village	5:
Mercy Circle	5:
Asbury Court Nursing and Rehab	4:
Park Ridge Healthcare Center	4:
Buckingham Pavilion	4:
Astoria Place Living and Rehab	4:
Norwood Crossing	4:
Ascension Saint Benedict	4:
Aperion Care Wesley	4:
Winston Manor Cnv and Nursing	4:
Park Place Health and Wellness Center	4:
Plymouth Place	4:
Ascension Resurrection Life	4:
Franciscan Village	4:
Beacon Hill	4:
The British Home	4:
Avantara Chicago Ridge	4:
Pearl of Evanston,the	4:
Elevate Care Palos Heights	4:
The Grove of Evanston L and R	3:
Dobson Plaza	3:
Birchwood Plaza	3:
The Waterford Care Center	3:
Clark Manor	3:
Alden North Shore Rehab and Hcc	3:
Lincolnwood Place	3:
Eden Vista Burr Ridge	3:
Balmoral Home	3:
All American Vlge Nrsg and Rhb	3:
Aperion Care Midlothian	3:
Alden Estates of Northmoor	3:
Ahva Care of Stickney	3:
Eden Vista Propect Heights	3:
Bella Terra Lagrange	3:
Aliya of Evanston	3:
Meadowbrook Manor - Lagrange	3:
Warren Barr Oak Lawn	3:
Generations at Regency	3:
Pearl of Rolling Meadows,the	3:
Citadel of Glenview,the	3:
Elevate Care Abington	3:
Warren Barr Gold Coast	3:
Bella Terra Elmhurst	3:
Smith Village	3:
Aliya of Homewood	3:
Bella Terra Lombard	3:
Alta Rehab at Oak Brook	3:
The Grove of Lagrange Park	3:
Alden Lincoln Rehab and H C Ctr	3:
Ignite Medical Resort Crown Point LLC	3:
Ascension Resurrection Place	2:
Generations Oakton Pavillion	2:
Frankfort Terrace	2:
South Holland Manor Hth and Rhb	2:
Lee Manor	2:
Fargo Health Care Center	2:
Midway Neurological / Rehab Center	2:
Westwood Vlge Nrsg and Rhb Ctr	2:
The Pavilion of Bridgeview	2:
Prairie Manor Nrsg and Rehab Ctr	2:
Aperion Care Burbank	2:
Avantara Park Ridge	2:
Chalet Living and Rehab	2:
Ryze at The Ridge	2:
Princeton Rehab and Hcc	2:
Warren Barr Orland Park	2:
Harmony Healthcare and Rehab Ctr	2:
Montgomery Place	2:
The Carlton at The Lake	2:
Forest View Rehab and Nursing Center	2:
Mado Healthcare - Uptown	2:
Paul House and Health Cr Ctr	2:
Saint Anthony	2:
Palos Heights Rehabilitation	2:
Ambassador Nursing and Rehab Center	2:

Medical Groups Affiliated with ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL

There are 643 doctors and 150 medical groups that are affiliated with ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with ADVOCATE TRINITY HOSPITAL.