OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER Ratings and Reviews

About OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER

OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in EVERGREEN PARK, IL. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Other. The facility's Medicare ID is 140179. It does provide emergency services. There are 416 medical professionals and 136 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER, emergency patients were charged $23,643. This is lower than the state average of $25,739. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	81 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	15 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	86 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	11 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	79 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	17 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	77 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	15 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	12 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	75 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	18 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	61 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	24 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	58 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	28 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	65 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	19 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	66 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	20 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	14 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	82 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	8 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	10 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	51 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	32 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	17 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	18 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	82 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	21 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	79 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	84 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	49 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	11 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	44 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	37 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	56 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	71 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	11 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	18 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	63 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	9 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	28 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	9 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	20 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	71 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	6 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	67 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	27 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$20
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$42
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$18
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$8
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$685
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$9,932
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$16
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,603
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$719
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$186
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,351
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$919
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,219
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$85
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,826
Total (Complete Episode)	$23,643

Infection Rates at OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER

These measures show how often patients at OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.19 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.47 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	7,521.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	6.58 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	4.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.61 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.34 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.03 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	4,516.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	5.46 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	5.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.92 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.39 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	4.19 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	76.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	1.95 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	3.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	1.54 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	70.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.63 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	5.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.10 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.99 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	59,758.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	3.31 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.60 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.02 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.23 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	57,254.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	35.67 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	3.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.08 / Better

How OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in EVERGREEN PARK, IL

Worst Hospitals in EVERGREEN PARK, IL

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3.5%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	14.2%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	6%	Better
Death rate for heart failure patients	9.7%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	14.8%	Better
Death rate for stroke patients	9%	Better
Pressure ulcer rate	0.24%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	177.94%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.26%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.01%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.47%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	8.47%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	4.45%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.38%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.87%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.11%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.89%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Alden Des Plaines Rehab and Hc	5:
Little Sisters of The Poor	5:
Oak Trace	5:
Burgess Square Healthcare Ctr	5:
Selfhelp Home of Chicago	5:
Alden Estates of Skokie	5:
Niles Nsg and Rehab Ctr	5:
Sunny Hill Nursing Home of Will County	5:
Wynscape Health and Rehab	5:
Victorian Village Hlth and Well	5:
Community First Medical Center	5:
Dupage Care Center	5:
Celebrate Senior Living Niles	5:
Citadel Care Center-Wilmette	5:
Central Baptist Village	5:
St Joseph Village of Chicago	5:
Gottlieb Memorial Hospital	5:
Ascension Casa Scalabrini	5:
West Suburban Medical Ctr	5:
Park Place Christian Community	5:
The Mather Evanston	5:
Terraces at The Clare	5:
Mercy Circle	5:
The Admiral at The Lake	5:
The Grove of Skokie	5:
Vi at The Glen	5:
Westminster Place	5:
Alden Estates of Evanston	5:
Encore Village	5:
Ascension Nazarethville Place	5:
Thrive of Lisle	5:
Buckingham Pavilion	4:
Avantara Chicago Ridge	4:
Norwood Crossing	4:
Astoria Place Living and Rehab	4:
Ignite Medical Hanover Park	4:
Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf	4:
Asbury Court Nursing and Rehab	4:
Bella Terra Streamwood	4:
Pearl of Evanston,the	4:
Ascension Resurrection Life	4:
Park Place Health and Wellness Center	4:
Alden Poplar Creek Rehab and Hcc	4:
Arista Healthcare	4:
Aperion Care Wesley	4:
Ahva Care of Winfield	4:
Winston Manor Cnv and Nursing	4:
Beacon Hill	4:
Elevate Care Palos Heights	4:
Plymouth Place	4:
The British Home	4:
Ascension Saint Benedict	4:
Franciscan Village	4:
Park Ridge Healthcare Center	4:
Lincolnwood Place	3:
Aliya of Homewood	3:
Balmoral Home	3:
Warren Barr Oak Lawn	3:
Joliet Terrace	3:
Alden North Shore Rehab and Hcc	3:
Alden Estates of Northmoor	3:
Citadel of Glenview,the	3:
Elevate Care Abington	3:
Alden Lincoln Rehab and H C Ctr	3:
Eden Vista Burr Ridge	3:
Warren Barr Gold Coast	3:
Covenant Living - Windsor Park	3:
Ahva Care of Stickney	3:
Aperion Care Midlothian	3:
All American Vlge Nrsg and Rhb	3:
Bella Terra Elmhurst	3:
Aliya of Evanston	3:
The Grove of Evanston L and R	3:
Dobson Plaza	3:
Generations at Regency	3:
Bella Terra Lombard	3:
Alta Rehab at Oak Brook	3:
The Waterford Care Center	3:
Clark Manor	3:
The Grove of Lagrange Park	3:
Meadowbrook Manor	3:
Meadowbrook Manor - Lagrange	3:
Bella Terra Lagrange	3:
Birchwood Plaza	3:
Smith Village	3:
Ignite Medical Resort Crown Point LLC	3:
Ryze at The Ridge	2:
Bria of Palos Hills	2:
Pine Crest Health Care	2:
Frankfort Terrace	2:
Abbington Vlge Nrsg and Rhb Ctr	2:
South Holland Manor Hth and Rhb	2:
Midway Neurological / Rehab Center	2:
Harmony Healthcare and Rehab Ctr	2:
Ambassador Nursing and Rehab Center	2:
Mado Healthcare - Uptown	2:
The Pavilion of Bridgeview	2:
West Suburban Nursing and Rehab Center	2:
Paul House and Health Cr Ctr	2:
Aperion Care Burbank	2:

Medical Groups Affiliated with OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER

There are 416 doctors and 136 medical groups that are affiliated with OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with OSF LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER.