UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS Ratings and Reviews

About UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in TOPEKA, KS. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Church. The facility's Medicare ID is 170016. It does provide emergency services. There are 388 medical professionals and 107 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS, emergency patients were charged $23,936. This is lower than the state average of $25,943. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	20 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	80 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	21 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	67 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	25 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	74 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	21 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	85 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	12 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	73 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	64 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	29 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	53 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	32 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	51 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	34 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	56 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	30 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	54 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	26 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	20 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	69 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	14 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	38 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	38 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	24 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	84 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	85 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	83 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	46 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	48 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	52 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	41 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	50 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	46 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	58 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	74 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	9 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	17 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	51 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	11 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	38 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	11 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	25 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	64 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	7 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	70 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	23 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$11
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$34
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$158
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$17
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$8
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$644
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11,011
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$23
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,235
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$567
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$253
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,673
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,304
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,970
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$78
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$950
Total (Complete Episode)	$23,936

Infection Rates at UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS

These measures show how often patients at UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.03 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.47 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	2,403.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	2.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.50 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.02 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.24 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	2,678.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	2.21 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.45 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.12 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	2.45 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	103.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	2.69 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.74 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	34.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.29 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.03 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	3.03 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	32,761.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	1.63 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.61 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.29 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	1.08 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	30,381.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	15.27 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	9.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.59 / Same

How UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in TOPEKA, KS

Worst Hospitals in TOPEKA, KS

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	13%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	2.8%	SAME
Death rate for COPD patients	12.1%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	11%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	19.6%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	12.9%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	1.28%	Worse
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	193.23%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.2%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.49%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.63%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	10.1%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	2.67%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	5.4%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	2.38%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.78%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.17%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Brookside Retirement Community	5:
Lawrence Presbyterian Manor	5:
Lawrence Memorial Hospital Snf	5:
Brewster Health Center	5:
Countryside Health Center	5:
Lexington Park Nursing and Post Acute Center	5:
Community Hospital Onaga Ltcu	5:
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community	4:
Mccrite Plaza Health Center	4:
The Healthcare Resort of Topeka	4:
Topeka Presbyterian Manor	3:
Brighton Place North	3:
F W Huston Medical Center	3:
Valley Health Care Center	3:
Providence Living Center	2:
Brighton Place West	2:
Heritage Gardens Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Anew Healthcare	2:
Eskridge Care and Rehab	1:
The Gardens at Aldersgate	1:
Tanglewood Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:
Rolling Hills Health Center	1:
Plaza West Healthcare and Rehab	1:
Legacy On 10th Avenue	1:
Rossville Healthcare and Rehab Center	1:
Excel Healthcare and Rehab Topeka	No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS

There are 388 doctors and 107 medical groups that are affiliated with UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM - ST FRANCIS CAMPUS.