CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS Ratings and Reviews

About CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS

CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in GRAND ISLAND, NE. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Church. The facility's Medicare ID is 280023. It does provide emergency services. There are 207 medical professionals and 66 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS, emergency patients were charged $27,215. This is higher than the state average of $26,737. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	77 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	21 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	86 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	24 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	24 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	18 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	87 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	71 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	24 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	6 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	31 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	58 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	5 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	37 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	68 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	6 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	26 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	60 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	17 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	23 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	73 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	8 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	19 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	46 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	27 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	27 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	89 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	10 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	90 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	88 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	50 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	48 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	49 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	41 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	53 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	74 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	6 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	20 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	66 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	3 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	31 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	6 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	24 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	70 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	65 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	32 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$11
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$36
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$372
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$18
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$783
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11,723
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$52
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,390
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$700
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$222
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,376
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,022
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,873
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$131
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,495
Total (Complete Episode)	$27,215

Infection Rates at CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS

These measures show how often patients at CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.23 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	4.53 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	1,800.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.46 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	1.37 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.04 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	3.73 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	1,737.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.32 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.76 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	15.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	0.38 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	2.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	15.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.12 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	2.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.04 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	4.15 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	19,068.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	1.19 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.84 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.12 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.87 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	18,085.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	11.07 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	4.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.36 / Better

How CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in GRAND ISLAND, NE

Worst Hospitals in GRAND ISLAND, NE

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	12.7%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	9.5%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	13.2%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	17.7%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	13%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.74%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.22%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.23%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.5%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	8.28%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	2.68%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	6.11%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.9%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.99%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Chi Health St Francis	5:
Brookefield Park	5:
Tiffany Square	4:
Harvard Rest Haven	3:
Memorial Community Care	3:
Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital	3:
Premier Estates of Kenesaw, LLC	2:
Tabitha at Prairie Commons	2:
Good Samaritan Society - Hastings Village	1:
Westfield Quality Care of Aurora	1:
Emerald Nursing and Rehab Lakeview	1:
The Cedars at Broadwell	1:
Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island Village	1:
The Oaks at Central City	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS

There are 207 doctors and 66 medical groups that are affiliated with CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with CHI HEALTH ST. FRANCIS.