CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY Ratings and Reviews

About CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY

CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in LITTLE ROCK, AR. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 40007. It does provide emergency services. There are 459 medical professionals and 94 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY, emergency patients were charged $29,800. This is higher than the state average of $25,829. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	81 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	69 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	9 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	22 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	67 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	9 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	24 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	16 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	15 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	71 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	22 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	54 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	18 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	28 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	54 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	17 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	29 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	55 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	20 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	25 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	55 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	26 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	19 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	69 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	15 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	16 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	42 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	38 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	20 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	84 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	21 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	79 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	88 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	48 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	49 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	9 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	42 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	37 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	56 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	52 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	23 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	25 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	60 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	10 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	30 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	14 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	26 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	60 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	11 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	59 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	30 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$11
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$65
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$288
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$10
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$8
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$760
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$16,012
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$25
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$2,045
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$630
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$220
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$5,237
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$781
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$2,282
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$103
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,322
Total (Complete Episode)	$29,800

Infection Rates at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY

These measures show how often patients at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.70 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.70 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	16,672.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	17.87 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	20.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	1.12 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.11 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	0.55 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	16,936.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	22.68 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	6.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.27 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.31 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.26 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	431.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	12.09 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	8.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.66 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	48.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.35 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.14 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.09 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	81,087.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	8.83 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	4.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.45 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.23 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.63 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	81,087.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	40.39 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	16.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.40 / Better

How CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in LITTLE ROCK, AR

Worst Hospitals in LITTLE ROCK, AR

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	12.7%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	3.2%	SAME
Death rate for COPD patients	9.8%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	12.6%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	17.8%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	15.9%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	1%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	190.59%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.28%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	4.07%	Worse
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	2.28%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	13.56%	Worse
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.11%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	6.2%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	3.09%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.8%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.32%	Worse

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Arkansas Health Center	5:
Spring Creek Health and Rehab	5:
Greystone Nursing and Rehab, LLC	5:
Superior Health and Rehab, LLC	5:
Heritage Living Center	5:
The Springs of Chenal	4:
Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center,inc	4:
Presbyterian Village, Inc	4:
Arkansas State Veterans Home at North Little Rock	4:
The Blossoms at North Little Rock Rehab and Nursing	4:
Sherwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc	4:
Amberwood Health and Rehabilitation	3:
Southern Trace Rehabilitation and Care Center	3:
The Springs of Barrow	3:
Lakewood Health and Rehab, LLC	3:
Salem Place Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc	3:
Conway Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Cavalier Healthcare of England	2:
Alcoa Pines Health and Rehabilitation	2:
Evergreen Living Center at Stagecoach	2:
The Blossoms at West Dixon Rehab and Nursing Center	2:
Colonel Glenn Health and Rehab, LLC	2:
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center at Good Shepherd	2:
The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab and Nursing Cen	2:
The Blossoms at Midtown Rehab and Nursing Center	2:
Lonoke Health and Rehab Center, LLC	2:
Pleasant Valley Rehabilitation and Nursing	2:
Hickory Heights Health and Rehab, LLC	2:
Premier at The Springs	2:
Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC	2:
The Lakes at Maumelle Health and Rehabilitation	2:
Cabot Health and Rehab, LLC	2:
Heartland Rehabilitation and Care Center	1:
The Blossoms at Cumberland Rehab and Nursing Center	1:
The Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove	1:
Cottage Lane Health and Rehab of Little Rock	1:
The Springs of Pinnacle Mountain	1:
Woodland Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation	1:
St Andrews Healthcare	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY

There are 459 doctors and 94 medical groups that are affiliated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY.