ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER Ratings and Reviews

About ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER

ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in TULSA, OK. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 370114. It does provide emergency services. There are 556 medical professionals and 108 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER, emergency patients were charged $30,378. This is higher than the state average of $26,602. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	20 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	80 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	16 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	69 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	24 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	69 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	23 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	12 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	74 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	70 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	23 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	55 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	31 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	51 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	35 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	57 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	28 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	55 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	24 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	21 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	69 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	11 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	20 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	40 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	36 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	24 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	83 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	21 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	79 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	13 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	87 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	47 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	50 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	40 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	46 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	46 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	39 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	55 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	69 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	10 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	21 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	50 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	12 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	38 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	12 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	24 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	64 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	8 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	66 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	26 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$18
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$1
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$40
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$290
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$18
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$23
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$936
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$13,887
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$28
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,938
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$754
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$273
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$5,293
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$746
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,260
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$218
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,656
Total (Complete Episode)	$30,378

Infection Rates at ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER

These measures show how often patients at ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.22 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	0.77 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	21,760.00 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	23.23 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	10.00 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.43 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.62 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.32 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	22,009.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	29.26 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	27.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.92 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	1.79 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	3.54 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	485.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	12.93 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	33.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery	2.55 / Worse
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	0.30 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	1.80 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	733.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	6.17 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	5.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	0.81 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.46 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	1.43 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	136,943.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	14.25 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	12.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.84 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.28 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.55 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	124,330.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	87.75 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	35.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.40 / Better

How ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in TULSA, OK

Worst Hospitals in TULSA, OK

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	13.5%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	5.9%	Worse
Death rate for COPD patients	8.9%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	12.8%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	19.5%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	14.3%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.71%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	182.23%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.29%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.41%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.85%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	11.94%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.9%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	7.97%	Worse
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	2.04%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.29%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.26%	Worse

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Cearu Medical Resort	5:
Covenant Living at Inverness	5:
Montereau, Inc	5:
The Villages at Southern Hills	5:
Franciscan Villa	5:
Trinity Woods, Inc.	5:
The Highlands at Owasso	5:
The Gardens	4:
Arbor Village	4:
University Village Retirement Community	4:
Aspen Health and Rehab	4:
Tulsa Nursing Center	4:
Saint Simeons Episcopal Home	4:
Rolling Hills Care Center	4:
Baptist Village of Owasso	4:
Claremore Skilled Nursing and Therapy	4:
Haskell Care Center	3:
Rainbow Health Care Community and Rainbow Assisted	3:
Glenwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy	3:
Senior Suites Healthcare	3:
Forest Hills Care and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Colonial Manor Nursing Home	3:
Gracewood Health and Rehab	3:
Sand Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Cimarron Pointe Care Center	3:
Green Country Care Center	3:
Sequoyah Pointe Living Center	3:
Coweta Care and Rehab Center	2:
Beacon Ridge	2:
The Cottage Extended Care	2:
Cedarcrest Care Center	2:
Zarrow Pointe	2:
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center	2:
Oklahoma Memory Care Institute	2:
Skiatook Nursing Home,llc	2:
Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks	1:
Village Health Care Center	1:
Broken Arrow Nursing Home, Inc	1:
Maplewood Care Center	1:
Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center	1:
Sherwood Manor Nursing Home	1:
Leisure Village Health Care Center	1:
Emerald Care Center Tulsa	1:
Emerald Care Center Claremore	1:
Memory Care Center at Emerald	1:
North County Center For Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER

There are 556 doctors and 108 medical groups that are affiliated with ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with ASCENSION ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER.