SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC Ratings and Reviews

About SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC

SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in TULSA, OK. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 370091. It does provide emergency services. There are 963 medical professionals and 144 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC, emergency patients were charged $29,202. This is higher than the state average of $26,602. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	18 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	14 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	20 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	17 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	85 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	77 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	73 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	23 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	62 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	29 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	61 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	9 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	30 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	62 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	10 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	28 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	58 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	20 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	22 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	75 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	9 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	16 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	42 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	31 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	27 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	89 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	88 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	10 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	90 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	41 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	54 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	46 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	48 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	42 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	54 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	60 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	74 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	7 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	19 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	61 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	8 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	31 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	5 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	18 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	77 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	80 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	17 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$23
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$2
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$39
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$238
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$20
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$11
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$925
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$12,443
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$25
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,636
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$861
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$223
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$6,643
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,008
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$3,430
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$114
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,560
Total (Complete Episode)	$29,202

Infection Rates at SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC

These measures show how often patients at SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.50 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	0.99 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	43,701.00 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	46.52 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	33.00 / Better
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.71 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.33 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	0.74 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	27,175.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	47.80 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	24.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.50 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.57 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.59 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	535.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	15.26 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	15.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.98 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	0.37 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	2.26 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	521.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	4.90 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	5.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	1.02 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.15 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	0.60 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	275,953.00 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	25.37 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	8.00 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia	0.32 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.22 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.37 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	254,165.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	209.98 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	60.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.29 / Better

How SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in TULSA, OK

Worst Hospitals in TULSA, OK

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	3%	SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients	12.9%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	2.9%	SAME
Death rate for COPD patients	7.5%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	10.6%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	16%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	12.6%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.45%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	175.5%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.26%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.08%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	3.09%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.16%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	7.69%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.01%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	5.06%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.49%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.51%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.89%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Cearu Medical Resort	5:
Covenant Living at Inverness	5:
Montereau, Inc	5:
The Villages at Southern Hills	5:
Franciscan Villa	5:
Trinity Woods, Inc.	5:
The Highlands at Owasso	5:
The Gardens	4:
Arbor Village	4:
University Village Retirement Community	4:
Aspen Health and Rehab	4:
Tulsa Nursing Center	4:
Saint Simeons Episcopal Home	4:
Rolling Hills Care Center	4:
Baptist Village of Owasso	4:
Claremore Skilled Nursing and Therapy	4:
Haskell Care Center	3:
Glenwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy	3:
Senior Suites Healthcare	3:
Forest Hills Care and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Colonial Manor Nursing Home	3:
Gracewood Health and Rehab	3:
Sand Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Cimarron Pointe Care Center	3:
Green Country Care Center	3:
Sequoyah Pointe Living Center	3:
Coweta Care and Rehab Center	2:
Beacon Ridge	2:
The Cottage Extended Care	2:
Cedarcrest Care Center	2:
Zarrow Pointe	2:
Ambassador Manor Nursing Center	2:
Oklahoma Memory Care Institute	2:
Skiatook Nursing Home,llc	2:
Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks	1:
Village Health Care Center	1:
Broken Arrow Nursing Home, Inc	1:
Maplewood Care Center	1:
Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center	1:
Sherwood Manor Nursing Home	1:
Leisure Village Health Care Center	1:
Emerald Care Center Tulsa	1:
Lane Nursing and Ventilator Care	1:
Emerald Care Center Claremore	1:
Memory Care Center at Emerald	1:
North County Center For Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC

There are 963 doctors and 144 medical groups that are affiliated with SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC.