JPS HEALTH NETWORK Ratings and Reviews

About JPS HEALTH NETWORK

JPS HEALTH NETWORK is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in FORT WORTH, TX. Its type of ownership is Government - Hospital District or Authority. The facility's Medicare ID is 450039. It does provide emergency services. There are 646 medical professionals and 105 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at JPS HEALTH NETWORK, emergency patients were charged $29,310. This is higher than the state average of $27,898. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to JPS HEALTH NETWORK Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for JPS HEALTH NETWORK to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	21 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	79 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	17 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	69 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	24 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	70 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	24 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	82 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	14 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	74 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	71 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	22 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	57 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	12 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	31 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	56 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	12 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	32 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	56 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	30 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	55 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	24 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	21 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	71 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	12 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	40 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	35 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	25 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	84 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	83 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	85 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	54 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	38 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	59 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	31 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	55 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	38 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	51 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	43 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	63 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	14 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	23 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	46 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	18 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	36 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	10 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	24 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	66 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	7 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	64 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	29 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of JPS HEALTH NETWORK, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the JPS HEALTH NETWORK provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for JPS HEALTH NETWORK: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at JPS HEALTH NETWORK:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$13
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$2
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$13
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$163
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$20
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$6
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$1,055
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11,990
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$17
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,665
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$530
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$240
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$6,668
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,112
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,054
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$103
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,658
Total (Complete Episode)	$29,310

Infection Rates at JPS HEALTH NETWORK

These measures show how often patients at JPS HEALTH NETWORK contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.71 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.34 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	7,795.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	8.16 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	11.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	1.35 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.38 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.73 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	6,365.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	8.02 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	7.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.87 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	1.51 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	3.44 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	303.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	9.87 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	23.00 / Worse
SSI - Colon Surgery	2.33 / Worse
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	0.89 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	6.78 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	140.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	1.42 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	4.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	2.81 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.21 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	0.93 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	220,342.00 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	14.87 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	7.00 / Better
MRSA Bacteremia	0.47 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.13 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.31 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	212,392.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	105.90 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	22.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.21 / Better

How JPS HEALTH NETWORK Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how JPS HEALTH NETWORK compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in FORT WORTH, TX

Worst Hospitals in FORT WORTH, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at JPS HEALTH NETWORK

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	8.7%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	10.3%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	13.2%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	12.8%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	1.36%	Worse
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	175.11%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.29%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.11%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.17%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.85%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	7.38%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.82%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	6.14%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	2.61%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1.13%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.23%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near JPS HEALTH NETWORK

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near JPS HEALTH NETWORK ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Allegiant Wellness and Rehab	5:
The Villa at Mountain View	5:
The Stayton at Museum Way	5:
Trinity Terrace	5:
Purehealth Transitional Care at Thr Arlington	5:
Arden Place of Richland Hills	5:
La Dora Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5:
Heritage House at Keller Rehab and Nursing	5:
Grapevine Medical Lodge	5:
Burleson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Crowley Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
The Pavilion at Creekwood	4:
Crestview Court	4:
Arbrook Plaza	4:
James L West Center For Dementia Care	4:
Life Care Center of Haltom	4:
Irving Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
Parkwood Healthcare Community	4:
Bedford Wellness and Rehabilitation	4:
Forum Parkway Health and Rehabilitation	4:
Emerald Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	4:
The Villages On Macarthur	4:
Keller Oaks Healthcare Center	4:
Vista Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	4:
Hollymead	4:
Town Hall Estates Keene Inc	3:
Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Burleson	3:
Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Town Hall Estates Arlington Inc	3:
Green Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Village Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Arbor Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC	3:
Greenbrier Health Care Center	3:
Fort Worth Wellness and Rehabilitation	3:
Hurst Plaza Nursing and Rehab	3:
Las Brisas Rehabilitation and Wellness Suites	3:
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort	3:
Discovery Village at Southlake	3:
Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and Healthcare	3:
Rambling Oaks Courtyard Extensive Care Community	3:
Mansfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Matlock Place Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Ft Worth Southwest Nursing Center	2:
Pecan Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Wedgewood Nursing Home	2:
The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Ignite Medical Resort Fort Worth, LLC	2:
Renaissance Park Multi Care Center	2:
Immanuel's Healthcare	2:
Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Fort Worth Transitional Care Center	2:
West Side Campus of Care	2:
Downtown Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Arlington Residence and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Park View Care Center	2:
Heritage at Turner Park Health and Rehab	2:
Avante Rehabilitation Center	2:
Glenview Wellness and Rehabilitation	2:
Westpark Rehabilitation and Living	2:
Northgate Plaza	2:
The Lodge of Saginaw Health and Wellness	2:
North Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Bear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
The Harrison at Heritage	2:
Carrollton Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Springtown Park Rehabilitation and Care Center	2:
Sandy Lake Rehabilitation and Care Center	2:
Alvarado Ltc Partners Inc	1:
Midlothian Healthcare Center	1:
Mansfield Medical Lodge	1:
Park Bend Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	1:
Cedar Hill Healthcare Center	1:
Mira Vista Court	1:
Garden Terrace Alzheimer's Center of Excellence	1:
Benbrook Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Dfw Nursing and Rehab	1:
Ridgmar Medical Lodge	1:
Caraday of Ft. Worth	1:
Coral Rehabilitation and Nursing of Arlington	1:
White Settlement Nursing Center	1:
Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:
River Oaks Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Remarkable Healthcare of Dallas, LP	1:
Richland Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente	1:
Marine Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:
Lake Lodge Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:
Ashford Hall	1:
Oakmont Guest Care Center	1:
Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Azle Manor Health Care and Rehabilitation	1:
The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park	1:
Birchwood of Grapevine	1:
Lake Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Longmeadow Healthcare Center	1:
Midtowne Meadows Health and Rehab	No Data
Trail Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation	No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with JPS HEALTH NETWORK

There are 646 doctors and 105 medical groups that are affiliated with JPS HEALTH NETWORK.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with JPS HEALTH NETWORK is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with JPS HEALTH NETWORK.