MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE Ratings and Reviews

About MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE

MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in FORT WORTH, TX. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 670103. It does provide emergency services. There are 199 medical professionals and 84 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE, emergency patients were charged $23,734. This is lower than the state average of $27,898. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	75 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	84 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	22 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	70 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	23 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	71 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	21 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	15 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	69 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	23 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	65 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	24 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	29 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	64 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	28 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	29 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	58 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	24 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	18 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	72 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	13 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	15 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	45 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	35 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	20 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	86 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	85 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	86 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	43 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	49 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	49 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	43 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	37 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	56 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	77 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	7 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	16 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	65 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	7 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	28 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	9 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	15 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	76 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	8 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	74 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	18 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$30
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$94
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$83
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$1
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$7
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$692
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$10,217
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$26
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,463
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$806
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$244
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$6,096
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$467
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,756
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$110
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,640
Total (Complete Episode)	$23,734

Infection Rates at MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE

These measures show how often patients at MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.74 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	2,197.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.72 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.78 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	1,536.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.08 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	0.84 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	125.00 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	3.55 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	0.00 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.00 / Better
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	41.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.35 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	25,676.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	0.71 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	2.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.01 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.52 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	23,842.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	9.43 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	1.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.11 / Better

How MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in FORT WORTH, TX

Worst Hospitals in FORT WORTH, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	11.8%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	7.7%	SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients	11%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	16%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate	0.33%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.23%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.38%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.54%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	7.45%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.13%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	4.75%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.93%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	1%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	0.84%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
The Villa at Mountain View	5:
Purehealth Transitional Care at Thr Arlington	5:
Good Samaritan Society-Denton Village	5:
The Stayton at Museum Way	5:
Arden Place of Richland Hills	5:
Trinity Terrace	5:
Allegiant Wellness and Rehab	5:
Grapevine Medical Lodge	5:
La Dora Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5:
Heritage House at Keller Rehab and Nursing	5:
Life Care Center of Haltom	4:
Emerald Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	4:
Cottonwood Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
Keller Oaks Healthcare Center	4:
The Pavilion at Creekwood	4:
Good Samaritan Society -- Lake Forest Village	4:
The Villages On Macarthur	4:
Bedford Wellness and Rehabilitation	4:
Vista Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Forum Parkway Health and Rehabilitation	4:
Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	4:
Arbrook Plaza	4:
Hollymead	4:
Crestview Court	4:
Irving Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
Denton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	4:
Parkwood Healthcare Community	4:
James L West Center For Dementia Care	4:
Crowley Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Discovery Village at Southlake	3:
Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and Healthcare	3:
Greenbrier Health Care Center	3:
Arbor Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC	3:
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort	3:
Town Hall Estates Arlington Inc	3:
Fort Worth Wellness and Rehabilitation	3:
Rambling Oaks Courtyard Extensive Care Community	3:
Heritage Place of Decatur	3:
Village Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Las Brisas Rehabilitation and Wellness Suites	3:
The Hills Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Hurst Plaza Nursing and Rehab	3:
Green Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation	3:
Wedgewood Nursing Home	2:
Northgate Plaza	2:
The Lodge of Saginaw Health and Wellness	2:
The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
North Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
West Side Campus of Care	2:
Matlock Place Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Downtown Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Arlington Residence and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Ignite Medical Resort Fort Worth, LLC	2:
Park View Care Center	2:
The Harrison at Heritage	2:
Carrollton Health and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Springtown Park Rehabilitation and Care Center	2:
Sandy Lake Rehabilitation and Care Center	2:
Heritage at Turner Park Health and Rehab	2:
Brookhaven Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Mansfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Bear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Renaissance Park Multi Care Center	2:
Ft Worth Southwest Nursing Center	2:
Immanuel's Healthcare	2:
Pecan Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Avante Rehabilitation Center	2:
Glenview Wellness and Rehabilitation	2:
Westpark Rehabilitation and Living	2:
Fort Worth Transitional Care Center	2:
Dfw Nursing and Rehab	1:
Ridgmar Medical Lodge	1:
Caraday of Ft. Worth	1:
Oakmont Guest Care Center	1:
Garden Terrace Alzheimer's Center of Excellence	1:
Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Azle Manor Health Care and Rehabilitation	1:
The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park	1:
Benbrook Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Birchwood of Grapevine	1:
Coral Rehabilitation and Nursing of Arlington	1:
White Settlement Nursing Center	1:
Lake Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Park Bend Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	1:
Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Longmeadow Healthcare Center	1:
Mansfield Medical Lodge	1:
Corinth Rehabilitation Suites On The Parkway	1:
University Rehabilitation Center	1:
River Oaks Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Decatur Medical Lodge	1:
Vintage Health Care Center	1:
Remarkable Healthcare of Dallas, LP	1:
Richland Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente	1:
Marine Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:
Mira Vista Court	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE

There are 199 doctors and 84 medical groups that are affiliated with MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with MEDICAL CITY ALLIANCE.