CONTACT INFORMATION REVIEWS & MORE DATA

HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

  • Date Updated:  July 31, 2024
  • Address:  16655 SOUTHWEST FREEWAY, SUGAR LAND, TX 77479
  • Phone:  (281) 274-8000
  • Type:  Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership:  Voluntary non-profit - Private
  • Overall Rating:  
  • Perc. Patients Recommending:   82%

  About HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL

HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in SUGAR LAND, TX. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 450820. It does provide emergency services. There are 859 medical professionals and 169 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $27,558. This is lower than the state average of $27,898. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 17 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 76 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 19 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 79 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 16 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 87 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 16 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 74 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 19 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 60 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 12 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 28 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 60 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 11 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 29 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 61 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 13 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 26 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 61 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 21 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 18 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 73 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 10 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 48 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 32 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 20 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 86 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 83 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 89 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 40 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 54 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 46 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 41 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 54 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 34 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 61 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 78 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 6 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 16 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 68 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 6 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 26 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 6 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 14 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 80 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 82 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 15 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $24
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $53
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $122
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $4
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $20
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $693
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $11,846
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $33
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $1,708
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $815
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $227
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $6,493
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,147
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,976
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $241
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,154
Total (Complete Episode) $27,558

Infection Rates at HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.29 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.08 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 14,964.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 15.28 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 9.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.59 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.05 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 0.48 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 13,647.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 16.94 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 3.00 / Better
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.18 / Better
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit 0.61 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit 2.28 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 280.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 7.26 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 9.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery 1.24 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit 0.26 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit 5.02 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 160.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 1.32 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 2.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy 1.52 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.38 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 1.95 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 98,817.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 6.42 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 6.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia 0.94 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.15 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 0.39 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 96,073.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 72.09 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 18.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.25 / Better

How HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in SUGAR LAND, TX

Worst Hospitals in SUGAR LAND, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 3.7% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients 12.2% SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients 3.9% SAME
Death rate for COPD patients 6.6% SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients 7.6% Better
Death rate for pneumonia patients 11.5% Better
Death rate for stroke patients 12.5% SAME
Pressure ulcer rate 0.08% Better
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications 125% Better
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.17% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.09% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.47% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 2.34% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 9.93% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 2.2% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 5.08% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 1.67% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 0.87% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.84% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
Oak Bend Medical Center 5:
Paradigm at The Brazos 5:
The Rehab Suites at Magnolia Crossing 5:
Richard A. Anderson (state of Texas Veterans Land 5:
St Dominic Village Nursing Home 5:
The Methodist Hospital Snf 5:
West Oaks Nursing and Rehab Center 5:
Continuing Care at Eagles Trace 5:
Parkway Place 5:
Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy 5:
Mememorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 5:
Cypress Pointe Health and Wellness 5:
Spjst Rest Home No 2 4:
Tuscany Village 4:
Sugar Land Health Care Center 4:
Seven Acres Jewish Senior Care Services, Inc 4:
Houston Transitional Care 4:
Holly Hall 4:
Bayou Manor 4:
Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center 4:
The Buckingham 4:
Falcon Point Post Acute 4:
Ignite Medical Resort Katy, LLC 4:
Sterling Oaks Rehabilitation 4:
West Janisch Health Care Center 4:
Ashford Gardens 4:
Copperfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation 4:
Fall Creek Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 4:
Fort Bend Healthcare Center 3:
Thrive Rehabilitation of Pearland 3:
Park Manor of Quail Valley 3:
The Crescent 3:
Garden Terrace Alzheimer's Center of Excellence 3:
Harmony Care at Golfcrest 3:
The Lev Attown Park 3:
Brookdale Galleria 3:
Treemont Health Care Center 3:
The Hallmark 3:
The Vosswood Nursing Center 3:
Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Ka 3:
Highland Park Care Center 3:
Capstone Healthcare Estates at Veterans Memorial 3:
Park Manor of Cyfair 3:
Chelsea Gardens 2:
Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare 2:
The Colonnades at Reflection Bay 2:
Capstone Healthcare Estates On Orem 2:
Birchwood of Golfcrest 2:
Courtyard Nursing and Rehabilitation 2:
West Houston Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 2:
Clarewood House Extended Care Center 2:
Cascades at Jacinto Rehab LP 2:
Brookshire Residence and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Solera at West Houston 2:
Caraday of Houston 2:
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center - 2:
Eagle Crest Rapid Recovery 2:
Laurel Court 1:
Winchester Lodge Healthcare Center 1:
Rosenberg Health and Rehabilitation Center 1:
Oasis at Pearland 1:
Cambridge Health and Rehabilitation Center 1:
Richmond Health Care Center 1:
The Medical Resort at Sugar Land 1:
Paradigm at First Colony 1:
Terra Bella Health and Wellness Suites 1:
Paradigm at Westbury 1:
Focused Care at Westwood 1:
Afton Oaks Nursing Center 1:
Focused Care at Beechnut 1:
University Place Nursing Center 1:
Park Manor of Westchase 1:
Oasis at Galleria LLC 1:
The Concierge 1:
Casa Azul Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 1:
Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation 1:
Arden Wood 1:
Windsor Houston 1:
Fallbrook Rehabilitation and Care Center 1:
Cypress Creek Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 1:
Spring Branch Transitional Care Center No Data
Paradigm at Woodwind Lakes No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL

There are 859 doctors and 169 medical groups that are affiliated with HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups


The list of medical professionals associated with HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL.

Healthcare Search Options

Make informed decisions about your healthcare options

Our site is designed to help you find the information you need quickly and easily, no matter what type of healthcare provider you're looking for. We provide a wealth of statistics and data that can help you make informed decisions about your healthcare options.

SEARCH OUR HEALTHCARE DATABASES

Home Healthcare

Nursing Homes

Owners & Operators

Dialysis

Hospitals

Doctor Groups

Doctors

Hospice

Purchase a Marketing or Other Report from our Database

We can provide custom data reports based on our database of skilled nursing facilities. Anything from emails to spreadsheets to an API. Bring the data directly into Salesforce or any other CRM.

  • Facility Name
  • Owner Name
  • Mailing Address
  • Contact Information
  • Phone Numbers
  • Website Addresses
  • File Formats: .xls, .csv, .txt
  • APIs

Reports updated monthly.

Request Report Pricing