RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

About RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in MCALLEN, TX. Its type of ownership is Proprietary. The facility's Medicare ID is 450711. It does provide emergency services. There are 227 medical professionals and 109 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $26,613. This is lower than the state average of $27,898. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL Data & Analysis

Survey Analysis
Cost Analysis
Infection Rates
Hospital Comparison
Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities
List of Associated Doctors

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	73 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	20 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	81 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	14 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	67 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	25 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	73 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	19 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	80 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	14 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	71 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	9 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	20 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	69 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	21 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	54 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	20 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	26 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	52 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	18 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	30 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	56 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	21 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	23 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	57 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	24 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	19 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	70 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	12 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	18 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	44 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	35 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	21 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	20 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	80 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	25 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	75 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	15 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	85 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	39 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	9 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	52 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	41 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	12 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	42 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	51 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	57 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	65 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	14 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	21 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	62 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	12 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	26 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	14 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	23 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	63 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	12 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	67 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	21 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL:

Type	Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$45
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$67
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$127
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$52
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$10
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission)	$640
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$11,620
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission)	$0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission)	$12
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission)	$1,408
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$512
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$273
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,708
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,023
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$4,266
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$85
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission)	$1,767
Total (Complete Episode)	$26,613

Infection Rates at RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.24 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.60 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	3,354.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	3.14 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	3.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.96 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.02 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.63 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	3,480.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	3.02 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.33 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	0.16 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	1.66 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	179.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	4.91 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	3.00 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery	0.61 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	46.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	0.38 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	0.13 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	2.47 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	62,579.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	2.68 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia	0.75 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.05 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	0.38 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	56,421.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	25.71 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	4.00 / Better
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.16 / Better

How RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in MCALLEN, TX

Worst Hospitals in MCALLEN, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	12.6%	SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	2.4%	SAME
Death rate for COPD patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients	10.8%	SAME
Death rate for pneumonia patients	18.5%	SAME
Death rate for stroke patients	12.5%	SAME
Pressure ulcer rate	0.47%	SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	149%	SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	0.21%	SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	0.09%	SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	2.14%	SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	1.52%	SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	10.57%	SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	3.08%	SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate	6.9%	SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	1.91%	SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	0.94%	SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	1.04%	SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
The Heights of Alamo	5:
Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home	5:
Mcallen Transitional Care Center	5:
Windsor Las Palmas Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent	5:
Grand Terrace Rehabilitation and Healthcare	5:
San Juan Nursing Home Inc	5:
Mission Valley Nursing and Transitional Care	5:
Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation	5:
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Edinb	5:
Windsor Arbor View	5:
Mid Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation	4:
Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	4:
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Mcall	3:
Mcallen Nursing Center	3:
Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3:
Weslaco Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Orchard Park Post Acute Nursing and Rehabilitation	2:
Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Valley Grande Manor	1:
Colonial Manor Advanced Rehab and Healthcare	1:
Las Alturas De Penitas	1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

There are 227 doctors and 109 medical groups that are affiliated with RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups

The list of medical professionals associated with RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL.