William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss) Ratings and Reviews

  About William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss)

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss) to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question	Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well	87 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well	11 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	91 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	7 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them	84 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them	13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	87 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	2 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well	89 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well	1 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well	10 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect	94 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect	0
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect	6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them	89 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them	2 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them	9 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand	86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand	1 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand	13 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted	76 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted	6 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted	18 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	76 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	5 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted	19 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	74 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted	18 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them	75 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them	12 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them	13 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for	84 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for	5 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.	11 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects	66 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects	17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects	17 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home	12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home	88 %
Discharge information - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge	17 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge	83 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	8 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge	92 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	31 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital	65 %
Care transition - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	38 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs	58 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	30 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health	66 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	28 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	3 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital	69 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean	85 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean	4 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean	11 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night	80 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night	1 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night	19 %
Quietness - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	3 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	11 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)	86 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating	Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital	2 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital	84 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital	14 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score	Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating	Not Applicable
Summary star rating	Not Applicable

Cost of William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss), Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss) provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss): Not Available

We do not have detailed cost analysis for William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss).

Infection Rates at William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss)

These measures show how often patients at William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss) contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type	Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	-- / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	1.73 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days	1,684.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	1.74 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	0.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)	0.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit	0.02 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit	2.21 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days	2,138.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases	2.23 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases	1.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)	0.45 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases	Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases	Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia	Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit	0.10 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit	2.04 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days	14,627.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases	3.25 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases	2.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)	0.62 / Same

How William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss) Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss) compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in El Paso, TX

Worst Hospitals in El Paso, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss)

Measure	Score	Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for pneumonia patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate for stroke patients	NA	Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications	NA	Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate	NA	Not Enough Data
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative respiratory failure rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative sepsis rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate	NA	Not Enough Data
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate	NA	Not Enough Data
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite	NA	Not Enough Data

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss)

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss) ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name	Overall Rating
Mountain Villa Nursing Center	3:
Good Samaritan Society--White Acres	3:
St Giles Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Oasis Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	2:
Center at Zaragoza, LLC	2:
Mountain View Health and Rehabilitation	2:
Nazareth Living Care Center	2:
Vibralife of El Paso Rehabilitation Center	2:
The Bartlett Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living	2:
Ambrosio Guillen Texas State Veterans Home	2:
Los Arcos Del Norte Care Center	2:
Las Ventanas De Socorro	1:
Pebble Creek Nursing Center	1:
El Paso Health and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Vista Hills Health Care Center	1:
Grace Pointe Wellness Center	1:
Regent Care Center of El Paso	1:
St. Teresa Nursing and Rehab Center	1:
Franklin Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation	1:
The Montevista at Coronado	1:
Cimarron Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1:
Patriot Rehabilitation and Wellness Center	1:
Tierra Este Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	No Data

Medical Groups Affiliated with William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss)

There are 0 doctors and 0 medical groups that are affiliated with William Beaumont AMG (FT Bliss).