CONTACT INFORMATION REVIEWS & MORE DATA

OROVILLE HOSPITAL Ratings and Reviews

  • Date Updated:  July 31, 2024
  • Address:  2767 OLIVE HIGHWAY, OROVILLE, CA 95966
  • Phone:  (530) 533-8500
  • Type:  Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership:  Voluntary non-profit - Private
  • Overall Rating:  
  • Perc. Patients Recommending:   71%

  About OROVILLE HOSPITAL

OROVILLE HOSPITAL is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in OROVILLE, CA. Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 50030. It does provide emergency services. There are 583 medical professionals and 193 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at OROVILLE HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $20,344. This is lower than the state average of $26,501. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for OROVILLE HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 61 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 10 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 29 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 71 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 23 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 55 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 11 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 34 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 56 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 32 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 65 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 25 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 74 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 62 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 28 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 59 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 13 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 28 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 37 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 25 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 38 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 38 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 25 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 37 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 36 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 26 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 38 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 46 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 30 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 24 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 58 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 17 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 25 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 33 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 43 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 24 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 21 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 79 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 23 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 77 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 20 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 80 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 54 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 12 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 34 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 58 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 18 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 24 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 57 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 33 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 48 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 44 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 55 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 20 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 25 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 33 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 28 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 39 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 23 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 35 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 42 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 20 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 38 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 42 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 80 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 16 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 9 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 77 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 18 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 76 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 12 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 90 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 3 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 82 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 14 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 78 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 18 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 64 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 10 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 26 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 64 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 6 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 30 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 63 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 23 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 70 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 13 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 17 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 81 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 7 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 12 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 59 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 20 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 21 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 89 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 13 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 87 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 10 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 90 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 60 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 45 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 49 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 37 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 3 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 60 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 26 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 70 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 67 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 10 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 23 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 48 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 18 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 34 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 7 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 25 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 68 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 5 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 71 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 24 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of OROVILLE HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the OROVILLE HOSPITAL provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for OROVILLE HOSPITAL: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at OROVILLE HOSPITAL:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $5
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $53
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $118
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $8
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $12
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $453
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $9,961
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $20
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $935
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $219
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $115
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $3,710
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $886
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,769
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $145
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $935
Total (Complete Episode) $20,344

Infection Rates at OROVILLE HOSPITAL

These measures show how often patients at OROVILLE HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.46 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 4.91 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 2,076.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 1.66 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 3.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 1.80 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.21 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.57 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 7,875.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 6.16 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 4.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.65 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 33.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 0.92 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 41.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 0.46 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 2.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.03 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 2.65 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 41,088.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 1.86 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 1.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia 0.54 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.36 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 1.04 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 41,088.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 22.07 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 14.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.63 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.01 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.28 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 3,766.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 3.85 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 1.00 / Same
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.26 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.08 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 1.53 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 3,974.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 4.31 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 2.00 / Same
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.46 / Same
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) Not Available / Not Available

How OROVILLE HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how OROVILLE HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in OROVILLE, CA

Worst Hospitals in OROVILLE, CA

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at OROVILLE HOSPITAL

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 4% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients 12.9% SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients 5.9% Better
Death rate for heart failure patients 9% Better
Death rate for pneumonia patients 13.9% Better
Death rate for stroke patients 13.4% SAME
Pressure ulcer rate 0.15% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications 168.67% SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.23% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.09% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 1.74% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.66% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 12.23% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 2.16% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 6.41% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 1.63% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 0.97% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.94% SAME
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart attack patients 11.6% SAME
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients 9.1% SAME
Death rate for heart failure patients 5.5% Better
Death rate for pneumonia patients 12.1% Better
Death rate for stroke patients NA Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate 1.16% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications 165.82% SAME
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.33% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.1% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.04% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.36% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 8.45% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.56% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 4.79% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 1.76% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.16% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 1.11% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near OROVILLE HOSPITAL

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near OROVILLE HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
Gridley Post Acute 5:
The Fountains 4:
Colusa Medical Center - Snf 3:
Country Crest Post-Acute 3:
Oroville Hospital Post-Acute Center 3:
California Park Rehabilitation Hospital 3:
Chico Terrace Healthcare and Wellness Centre, LP 3:
Yuba City Post Acute 2:
River Valley Care Center 2:
Arbor Post Acute 2:
Marysville Post-Acute 1:
Bridgeview Post Acute 1:
Feather River Care Center 1:
Riverside Point Healthcare and Wellness Centre 1:
Chico Heights Rehabilitation and Wellness Centre, L 1:

Medical Groups Affiliated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL

There are 583 doctors and 193 medical groups that are affiliated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL.

Affiliated Doctor Groups


The list of medical professionals associated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL.

Healthcare Search Options

Make informed decisions about your healthcare options

Our site is designed to help you find the information you need quickly and easily, no matter what type of healthcare provider you're looking for. We provide a wealth of statistics and data that can help you make informed decisions about your healthcare options.

SEARCH OUR HEALTHCARE DATABASES

Home Healthcare

Nursing Homes

Owners & Operators

Dialysis

Hospitals

Doctor Groups

Doctors

Hospice

Purchase a Marketing or Other Report from our Database

We can provide custom data reports based on our database of skilled nursing facilities. Anything from emails to spreadsheets to an API. Bring the data directly into Salesforce or any other CRM.

  • Facility Name
  • Owner Name
  • Mailing Address
  • Contact Information
  • Phone Numbers
  • Website Addresses
  • File Formats: .xls, .csv, .txt
  • APIs

Reports updated monthly.

Request Report Pricing