RICHARD COOPER

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with RICHARD COOPER

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that RICHARD COOPER is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
AVANTE AT LAKE WORTH, INC. Role: managing employee	No. of Beds: 138 LAKE WORTH, FL

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with RICHARD COOPER

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that RICHARD COOPER was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Avante at Leesburg, Inc Most Recent Record: 11/01/2019 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 116 LEESBURG, FL Ranking: #19 out of 37 (Ranking List)
Avante at Ormond Beach, Inc Most Recent Record: 01/01/2020 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 133 ORMOND BEACH, FL Ranking: #25 out of 30 (Ranking List)
Avante at Mt Dora, Inc Most Recent Record: 11/01/2019 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 116 MOUNT DORA, FL Ranking: #14 out of 73 (Ranking List)
Avante Villa at Jacksonville Beach Inc Most Recent Record: 01/01/2020 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 165 JACKSONVILLE BEACH, FL Ranking: #29 out of 50 (Ranking List)
Avante at St Cloud Inc Most Recent Record: 01/01/2020 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 131 SAINT CLOUD, FL Ranking: #19 out of 51 (Ranking List)
Avante at Melbourne Inc Most Recent Record: 05/01/2020 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 110 MELBOURNE, FL Ranking: #17 out of 18 (Ranking List)
Avante at Orlando Inc Most Recent Record: 11/01/2019 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 118 ORLANDO, FL Ranking: #25 out of 66 (Ranking List)
Avante at Ocala, Inc Most Recent Record: 10/01/2019 Role: officer	No. of Beds: 133 OCALA, FL Ranking: #19 out of 28 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.