CONTACT INFORMATION REVIEWS & MORE DATA

TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT Ratings and Reviews

  • Date Updated:  July 31, 2024
  • Address:  7115 GREENVILLE AVENUE SUITE 100, DALLAS, TX 75231
  • Phone:  (214) 647-5300
  • Type:  Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership:  Proprietary
  • Overall Rating:   Not Available
  • Perc. Patients Recommending:   86%

  About TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT is a Acute Care Hospitals. It is in DALLAS, TX. Its type of ownership is Proprietary. The facility's Medicare ID is 450889. It does provide emergency services. There are 72 medical professionals and 25 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT, emergency patients were charged $24,579. This is lower than the state average of $27,898. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

Quick Links to TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT Data & Analysis

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 89 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 8 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 89 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 87 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 10 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 90 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 87 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 8 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 90 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 84 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 8 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 89 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 4 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 7 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 89 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 4 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 7 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 88 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 3 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 9 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 81 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 10 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 9 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 91 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 5 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 4 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 70 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 14 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 16 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 88 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 14 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 86 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 10 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 90 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 29 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 65 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 33 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 8 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 59 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 30 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 65 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 23 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 71 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 88 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 5 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 7 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 84 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 7 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 9 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 4 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 9 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 87 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 86 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 11 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $11
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $14
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $567
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $18,221
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $78
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $2,314
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $331
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,308
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $336
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $524
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $65
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $809
Total (Complete Episode) $24,579

Infection Rates at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

These measures show how often patients at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 22.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.01 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 657.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 0.01 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 657.00 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 0.10 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) Not Available / Not Available

How TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in DALLAS, TX

Worst Hospitals in DALLAS, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 3.1% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for pneumonia patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for stroke patients NA Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate 0.57% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications NA Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.25% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.09% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.47% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.55% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 7.53% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.25% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 5.01% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate NA Not Enough Data
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.09% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.93% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
Prestonwood Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Inc 5:
Ventana By Buckner 5:
Pure Health Transitional Care at Texas Health Pres 5:
C C Young Memorial Home 5:
The Villa at Mountain View 5:
Villages of Lake Highlands 5:
Autumn Leaves 5:
Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr 5:
Mckinney Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 5:
Good Samaritan Society-Denton Village 5:
Purehealth Transitional Care at Thr Arlington 5:
Le Reve Rehabilitation and Memory Care 5:
Grapevine Medical Lodge 5:
Christian Care Center 5:
Highland Meadows Health and Rehab 5:
The Legacy Midtown Park 5:
Beltline Healthcare Center 5:
The Plaza at Edgemere 5:
Continuing Care at Highland Springs 5:
The Belmont at Twin Creeks 5:
La Dora Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 5:
Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 4:
Keller Oaks Healthcare Center 4:
Ridgecrest Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 4:
Bedford Wellness and Rehabilitation 4:
Walnut Place 4:
Life Care Center of Plano 4:
Vista Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4:
Arbrook Plaza 4:
Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center 4:
The Pavilion at Creekwood 4:
Crestview Court 4:
Palomino Place 4:
Signature Pointe 4:
Cottonwood Nursing and Rehabilitation 4:
Balch Springs Nursing Home 4:
Belterra Health and Rehab 4:
Parkwood Healthcare Community 4:
The Healthcare Resort of Plano 4:
Irving Nursing and Rehabilitation 4:
Forum Parkway Health and Rehabilitation 4:
Good Samaritan Society -- Lake Forest Village 4:
Denton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 4:
Hollymead 4:
The Madison On Marsh 4:
Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC 4:
San Remo 4:
The Villages On Macarthur 4:
Victoria Gardens of Allen 3:
Rambling Oaks Courtyard Extensive Care Community 3:
Mesquite Tree Nursing Center 3:
The Legacy at Willow Bend 3:
Las Brisas Rehabilitation and Wellness Suites 3:
Stonemere Rehabilitation Center 3:
The Lennwood Nursing and Rehabilitation 3:
Caraday Mesquite 3:
The Manor at Seagoville 3:
The Highlands Guest Care Center 3:
Edgewood Rehabilitation and Care Center 3:
Brentwood Place Three 3:
Carrara 3:
Beacon Harbor Healthcare and Rehabilitation 3:
Town Hall Estates Arlington Inc 3:
Green Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation 3:
Town East Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 3:
North Park Health and Rehabilitation Center 3:
Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and Healthcare 3:
Remington Transitional Care of Richardson 3:
Desoto Ltc Partners, Inc 3:
Hurst Plaza Nursing and Rehab 3:
Lexington Medical Lodge 3:
Farmersville Health and Rehabilitation 3:
Prairie Estates 3:
Cottonwood Creek Healthcare Community 3:
Greenbrier Health Care Center 3:
Traymore Nursing Center 3:
The Renaissance at Kessler Park 2:
Northgate Plaza 2:
Westridge Nursing and Rehabilitation 2:
City of Ennis Dba Broadmoor Medical Lodge 2:
The Park In Plano 2:
Accel at Willow Bend 2:
Fair Park Health and Rehabilitation Center 2:
The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation 2:
Brentwood Place One 2:
Lakewest Rehabilitation and Skilled Care 2:
Brentwood Place Four 2:
Brookhaven Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Windsor Gardens 2:
Bear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation 2:
The Rehabilitation and Wellness Centre of Dallas LLC 2:
Victoria Gardens of Frisco 2:
Garnet Hill Rehabilitation and Skilled Care 2:
The Hillcrest of North Dallas 2:
Pleasant Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cent 2:
The Villages of Dallas 2:
The Reserve at Richardson 2:
Avante Rehabilitation Center 2:
Carrollton Health and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Winters Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:

Healthcare Search Options

Make informed decisions about your healthcare options

Our site is designed to help you find the information you need quickly and easily, no matter what type of healthcare provider you're looking for. We provide a wealth of statistics and data that can help you make informed decisions about your healthcare options.

SEARCH OUR HEALTHCARE DATABASES

Home Healthcare

Nursing Homes

Owners & Operators

Dialysis

Hospitals

Doctor Groups

Doctors

Hospice

Purchase a Marketing or Other Report from our Database

We can provide custom data reports based on our database of skilled nursing facilities. Anything from emails to spreadsheets to an API. Bring the data directly into Salesforce or any other CRM.

  • Facility Name
  • Owner Name
  • Mailing Address
  • Contact Information
  • Phone Numbers
  • Website Addresses
  • File Formats: .xls, .csv, .txt
  • APIs

Reports updated monthly.

Request Report Pricing